期刊文献+

论快递企业服务补救策略的选择——基于成本收益比较机制视角 被引量:1

On Selection of Service Recovery Strategy in Express Enterprises——From the Perspective of Comparing Mechanisms Based on Cost Benefit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章基于当前快递行业的形式,着重分析快递企业在发生服务失败以后如何正确的选择服务补救策略,同时结合成本收益分析机制,保证快递企业的经济利益。阐述了快递企业成本收益机制的内容,然后运用这一机制,解决快递企业发生的服务失败,为企业减少损失,挽回形象。 Based on the current situation of express industry,the article makes an analysis of how to select the correct service recovery strategies in the event of a service failure and ensure the economic interests of express companies with the cost-benefit mechanisms.Besides,the article elaborates the content of cost-benefit mechanisms and makes the statement that this mechanism can be used to resolve a service failure occurred and reduce losses and to restore the image for companies.
作者 姚翠玲
出处 《天津职业院校联合学报》 2013年第6期104-108,共5页 Journal of Tianjin Vocational Institutes
关键词 服务失败 服务补救 成本收益分析机制 快递企业 service failure service recovery mechanism of cost-benefit analysis express enterprises
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

共引文献1

同被引文献7

  • 1杜建刚,范秀成.服务补救中情绪对补救后顾客满意和行为的影响——基于情绪感染视角的研究[J].管理世界,2007,23(8):85-94. 被引量:79
  • 2邮政统计http://www.spb.gov.cn/xytj/tjxx/201311 It20131114_254472.html.
  • 3Krishna, A, Dangayach, G.S., Jain, R. A Conceptual Framework for the Service Recovery Paradox [J]. The Marketing Review, 2011, 11(1): 41-56.
  • 4王超,杨立杰,刘伊生快速企业服务失误分析及其补救研究.Inter-national Conference on Engineering and Business Management, 2012: 138-141.
  • 5Parasuraman, A., Berry, LLL, Zeithaml, VA. Understanding Customer Expectations of Service [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1991, 32(3):39-48.
  • 6Hays, M., Hill, A.V: The Market Share Impact of Service Failures [J]. Production and Operations Management, 1999, 8(3):208-220.
  • 7Gronroos, C. Service Quality: The Six Criteria of Good Perceived Service Quality [J]. Review of Business, 1988, 9(8): 10-13.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部