期刊文献+

锁定钢板治疗股骨远端骨折的效果观察 被引量:7

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨锁定钢板用于治疗股骨远端骨折的临床效果及其并发症。方法回顾性分析我院2009年1月至2012年1月间因股骨远端骨折人院治疗108例患者的临床资料。采用锁定钢板治疗64例为实验组,44例采用动力髁螺钉治疗为对照组。观察并比较分析两组术中切口长度及出血时间,术后功能恢复、骨折愈合时间及出现的并发症;对于膝关节术后功能评定采用Shelbourne评定标准进行效果评定。结果108例患者均进行术后跟踪随访,随访时间为8~14个月。术中两组在切口长度及出血时间上比较,差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05);术后骨折愈合时间实验组短于对照组,而对于股骨髁间骨折c型骨折,对照组略显优势;膝关节术后功能Shelbourne评分,实验组的优良率为93.8%(60/64),对照组的优良率为77.3%(34/44),实验组明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(x2=6.274,P〈0.05);对于术后螺钉松动、骨折移位、膝关节屈曲、外展活动受限、感染等并发症的出现,实验组均低于对照组,总的发生率(6.3%与18.2%)差异有统计学意义(x2=6.587,P〈0.05)。结论应用锁定钢板对于高能量损伤及老年人骨质疏松导致股骨远端骨折的治疗有更好的效果,且并发症少。
出处 《中国综合临床》 2013年第10期1088-1091,共4页 Clinical Medicine of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献30

  • 1贺良,郭维光,孙林.股骨髁上骨折的手术治疗[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(4):235-238. 被引量:31
  • 2郭文荣,赵勇,林国兵,李玉茂,韩文海.超高龄病人髋关节手术可行性初探[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(3):181-182. 被引量:20
  • 3管国华,谢文龙,沈鹏,李伟,姬亚峰.逆行交锁髓钉与钢板治疗股骨髁骨折疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2006,12(1):59-61. 被引量:13
  • 4杨维全,郑炎,喻学军.股骨远端髁钢板治疗股骨髁部复杂型骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(14):1112-1113. 被引量:15
  • 5Chen SH, Yu TC, Chang CH, et al. Biomechanical analysis of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation in distal femoral fractures [ J ]. Knee, 2008,15 (5) :384-389.
  • 6Apivatthakakul T, Chiewcharntanakit S. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the treatment of the femoral shaft fracture where intramedullary nailing is not indicated [ J ]. Int Orthop, 2009,33 (4) : 1119-1126.
  • 7Kau FC, Tu YK, Su JY, et al. Treatment of distal femoral fracture by minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis: comparison between the dynamic condylar screw and the less invasive stabiliza- tion system [J].J Trauma, 2009,67(4) :719-726.
  • 8Heiney JP, Barnett MD, Vrabec GA, et al. Distal fenmral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary ( i. m. ) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate [ J ]. J Trauma, 2009,66 (2) : 443 -449.
  • 9Heyworth BE,Hedequist DJ,Nasreddine AY,et al. Distal femoralvalgus deformity following plate fixation of pediatric femoral shaftfractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(6):526-533.
  • 10Roderer G,Erhardt J,Graf M,et al. Clinical results for minimallyinvasive locked plating of proximal humerus fractures [J]. J OrthopTrauma,2010,24(7):400-406.

共引文献21

同被引文献81

  • 1马春杰.多轴锁定钢板治疗不稳定肱骨近端骨折[J].中国实用医刊,2010,37(13):88-89. 被引量:2
  • 2喻长纯,王战朝,杨明路.股骨髁支撑钢板治疗股骨远端骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(10):701-702. 被引量:16
  • 3张伟曾,李福平.髁支撑钢板内固定治疗股骨远端粉碎性骨折[J].中国药物与临床,2006,6(5):396-397. 被引量:1
  • 4Xu Y,G eng D,Yang H,et al.Treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures:comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation and gamma nail 3[J].Orthopedics.2010,33(7):473.
  • 5Hoffmann S,Paetzold R,Stephan D,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of interlocking lag screw design in intramedullary nailing of unstable pertrochanteric fractures[J].J Orthop Trauma,2013,27(9):483-490.
  • 6Nüchtem JV,Ruecker AH,Sellenschloh K,et al.Malpositioning of the lag-screws by one-or two-screw nailing systems for pertrochanteric femoral fractures:a biomechanical comparison of Gamma3 and Intertan[J].J Orthop Trauma,2014,Epub ahead of print.
  • 7Rupprecht M,Grossterlinden L,Sellenschloh K,et al.Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with posterior comminution:a biomechanical comparison of DHS(R) and Intertan nail(R)[J].Int Orthop,2011,35(11):1695-1701.
  • 8Zhang S,Zhang K,Jia Y,et al.Intertan nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures[J].Orthopedics,2013,36(3):e288-e294.
  • 9Ruecker AH,Rupprecht M,Gmber M,et al.The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures:results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression[J].J Orthop Tranma,2009,23(1):22-30.
  • 10Chun-Jui Weng,Chi-Chuan Wu,Kuo-Fun Feng. High incidence of varus deformity in association with condylar buttress plates used to treat supraintercondylar fracture of the femur[J].Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders,2012,(02):50-55.

引证文献7

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部