期刊文献+

生产性能测定站对生长猪应激水平和采食行为的影响 被引量:5

Effects of Electronic Feeding Station on Stress Level and Feeding Behavior of Growing Pigs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本试验旨在研究生产性能测定站对猪只应激水平及采食行为的影响。选用体重为(28.2±3.41)kg的大白生长猪122头,公母各半,按圈随机分成普通料槽15头组、测定站15头组以及测定站8头组,15头组3个重复,8头组4个重复,试验期44d。试验期间,测定猪只皮肤温度和唾液皮质醇水平,并对猪只采食行为进行分析。结果表明:3个处理之间,猪只唾液皮质醇水平差异不显著。测定站显著提高了猪只第2天时的皮肤温度(P<0.05),极显著降低了第15天的猪只皮温(P<0.01)。测定站8头组猪只采食量略高于测定站15头组,并且30d以后猪只采食量差距呈增大趋势。测定站8头组猪只采食次数低于测定站15头组,但日累计采食时间高于测定站15头组。测定站8头组和15头组猪只在09:00、15:00以及19:00时存在采食高峰,但测定站15头组猪只日节律采食行为变化曲线较为平缓。 The aim of this experiment was to study the effects of electronic feeding station on stress response and feeding behavior of growing pigs. One hundred and twenty-two Large White growing pigs with initial weight of (28. 2 ±3. 41) kg were randomly allotted into station 15 group, common silo 15 group and station 8 group by pens. The pigs were stratified by sex. The 15 groups had 3 replications, and 8 group had 4 replications. Feeding period was 44 days. During the test period, the skin temperature of pigs was tested, and the saliva was collected to determine the cortisol concentration. At the same time, the feeding behavior was analyzed. The results showed that salivary cortisol level of pigs had no significant differences between the three treat- ments. The station significantly increased the pig skin temperature (P〈0.05) on 2na day, and significantly decreased skin temperature (P〈0.01) on 15th day. Feed intake of pigs in station 8 group was slighter higher than that in station 15 group, and the gap of feed intake tended to be lager after 30 days. Intake times of pigs in station 8 group was lower than that in station 15 group, but the cumulative feeding time during a day was higher than that in station 15 group. Both station 8 and 15 group had feeding peaks at 09:00, 15:00 and 19:00,but the daily feedingbehavior curve of pigs in station 15 group was more gentle.
出处 《畜牧兽医学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期1411-1416,共6页 ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA
基金 国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAD39B02) 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201003011 201003060)
关键词 生产性能测定站 生长猪 应激水平 采食行为 electronic feeding station growing pigs stress level feeding behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1MORROW A T S, WALKER N. Effects of number and siting of single-space feeders on performance and feeding behavior of growing pigs [J]. Agric Sci, 1994, 122:465-470.
  • 2JENSEN K H, SORENSEN L S, BERTELSEN D, et al. Management factors affecting activity and ag- gression in dynamic group housing systems with elec- tronic sow feeding: a field trial[J]. Anita Sci, 2000, 71(7) : 535-545.
  • 3ANIL L,ANIL S S, DEEN J, et aI. Evaluation of well-being, productivity and longevity of pregnant sows housed in groups in pens with an electronic sow feeder or separately in gestation stalls[J]. Am J Vet Res, 2006, 66(3):1630-1638.
  • 4AREY D S, EDWARDS S A. Factors influencing ag- gression between sows after mixing and the conse- quences for welfare and production[J]. Livest Prod Sci, 1998, 56(1): 61-70.
  • 5SPOOLDER H A M, EDWARDS S A, CORNING S. Aggression among finishing pigs following mixing in kennelled and unkennelled accommodation[J]. Li vest Prod Sci, 2000, 68(2) : 107-120.
  • 6殷宗俊,汪春乾,王自立,刘有水,汪勇.饲养密度对断奶仔猪生长和行为的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2000,27(1):79-81. 被引量:12
  • 7DINAND E, BART S, WILLEM G P, et al. The effects of mixing on behavior and circadian parameters of salivary cortisol in pigs[J]. Physiol Behav, 1997, 62(1) : 181-184.
  • 8ESTER P, BERT D, CHRISTEL P H, et al. Effect of temporary straw bedding on pigs' behavior, per- formance, cortisol and meat quality[J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 2006, 98(3-4): 234-248.
  • 9GODELIEVE K, HANS H, MAAIKE F, et al. Cortisol administration to pregnant sows affects nov- elty-induced locomotion, aggressive behavior, and blunts gender differences in their offspring[J]. Horm Behav, 2006, 49(5): 663-672.
  • 10KOBELT A J, HEMSWORTH P H, BARNETT J L, et al. Sources of sampling variation in saliva corti- sol in dogs[J]. Res Vet Sci, 2003, 75(2) :157-161.

二级参考文献4

  • 1陈友慷,李治沦,潘其清,王琳,彭波,王岩,邓修玲.饲养密度对猪生产效果和行为的影响[J].家畜生态,1994,15(2):14-17. 被引量:19
  • 2李炳坦.养猪生产技术[M].北京:农业出版社,1989.394-396.
  • 3张仲葛,中国实用养猪学,1990年,395页
  • 4李炳坦,养猪生产技术,1989年,394页

共引文献23

同被引文献66

  • 1顾招兵,李明丽,高娅俊,林保忠,李保明.自由式分娩猪栏设计及应用效果[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(S2):40-44. 被引量:10
  • 2杨国明.猪采食行为研究进展[J].猪业科学,2006,23(3):14-16. 被引量:16
  • 3刘世荣,刘雁征,李云开.规模化猪场动物福利的环境丰富度调控技术研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2007,34(12):129-132. 被引量:8
  • 4BAXTER E M,ADELEYE O O,JACK M C,et al. A- chieving optimum performance in a loose-housed far- rowing system for sowsThe effects of space and tem- perature[J]. Appl Anirn Behav Sci , 2015,169 : 9-16.
  • 5CHIDGEY K L,MOREL P C H,STAFFORD K J,et al. Sow and piglet productivity and sow reproductive performance in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial New Zealand Pig Farm[J]. Livest Sci ,2015,173:87-94.
  • 6BONDE M,ROUSING T,BADSBERG J H, et al. As sociations between lying down behaviour problems and body condition,limb disorders and skin lesions of lactating sows housed in farrowing crates in commer- cial sow herds[J]. Livest Prod Sci, 2004,87 (2-3) : 179-187.
  • 7SILVA B A N,OLIVEIRA R F M,DONZELE J L,et al. Effect of floor cooling on performance of lactating sows during summer[J]. Livest Sci, 2006,105 (1-3) : 176-184.
  • 8LAWRENCE A B, P ETHERICK J C, MCLEAN K A,et al. The effect of environment on behaviour,plas ma cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows[J]. Appl Anita Behav Sci ,1994,39(94) :313-330.
  • 9OLIVIERO C, HEINONEN M, VALROS A, et al. Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing[J]. Anirn Re prod Sci , 2010,119 (1-2) :85-91.
  • 10BRACKE M B M,SPRUIJT B M,METZ J H M,et al. Decision support system for overall welfare assess- ment in pregnant sows A:Model structure and weigh- ting procedure[J]. J Anita Sci, 2002a, 80 (7) : 1819- 1834.

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部