期刊文献+

胸段食管鳞癌肝总淋巴结清扫的策略 被引量:3

Discussion on the strategies of common hepatic artery lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squa- mous cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析胸段食管鳞癌中肝总淋巴结转移规律,探讨肝总淋巴结清扫的策略。方法回顾性分析2005年5月至2010年12月复旦大学附属肿瘤医院收治的682例食管鳞癌患者的临床资料。分析胸段食管鳞癌区域淋巴结转移情况、肝总淋巴结转移率与临床病理因素的关系及患者术后近期并发症发生情况。计数资料采用x2检验。结果682例胸段食管鳞癌患者共清扫淋巴结18277枚,平均清扫27枚/例,淋巴结转移率为55.87%(381/682),淋巴结转移度为7.87%(1438/18277)。在所有清扫的淋巴结中,贲门旁淋巴结、喉返神经旁淋巴结、胃小弯淋巴结、颈段食管旁淋巴结、胃左动脉旁淋巴结转移率较高,而肝总淋巴结转移率最低,并且无单独肝总淋巴结转移,全部伴有区域淋巴结转移。682例患者共清扫肝总淋巴结1480枚,平均清扫2枚/例。24例患者发生肝总淋巴结转移,淋巴结转移率为3.52%(24/682),淋巴结转移度为2.16%(32/1480)。胸上、中、下段食管鳞癌肝总淋巴结转移率分别为2.33%(1/43)、3.76%(16/425)、3.27%(7/214),3者比较,差异无统计学意义(x^2=0.295,P〉0.05);T1、T2、T3期患者的肝总淋巴结转移率分别为2.35%(2/85)、5.46%(10/183)、2.90%(12/414),3者比较,差异无统计学意义(x^2=2.850,P〉0.05);高、中、低分化食管鳞癌患者肝总淋巴结转移率分别为0(0/63)、3.50%(16/457)、4.94%(8/162),3者比较,差异无统计学意义(x^2=3.259,P〉0.05);肿瘤直径≤3em、〉3CA且≤5cm、〉5cm的患者肝总淋巴结转移率分别为2.59%(6/232)、3.02%(11/364)、8.14%(7/86),3者比较,差异有统计学意义(X^2=6.267,P〈0.05);N分期中N0、N1、N2、N3期患者的肝总淋巴结转移率分别为0(0/301)、2.53%(5/198)、5.65%(7/124)和20.34%(12/59),4者比较,差异有统计学意义(,=62.368,P〈0.05);肿瘤TNM分期中I、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期患者肝总淋巴结转移率分别为O(O/62)、1.78%(6/337)、5.06%(13/257)、19.23%(5/26),4者比较,差异有统计学意义(X2=25.959,P〈0.05)。228例患者术后出现并发症,并发症发生率为33.43%(228/682),其中吻合口瘘的发生率最高,发生率为11.58%(79/682)。结论胸段食管鳞癌区域淋巴结转移中肝总淋巴结转移率最低,对于I期或者肿瘤直径45cm的食管鳞癌患者,手术过程中可考虑不常规行肝总淋巴结清扫。 Objective To analyze the metastatic rule of common hepatic artery lymph node of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and to investigate the strategies of common hepatic artery lymph node dissec tion. Methods The clinical data of 682 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were admitted to the Cancer Hospital of Fudan University from May 2005 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The locoregional lymph node metastasis of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, relationship between metastatic rates of common hepatic artery lymph node and clinicopathological factors and the postoperative complications were analyzed. The enumeration data were analyzed using the chi-square test. Results A total of 18 277 lymph nodes were dissected (27 lymph nodes per patient). The lymph node metastatic rate was 55.87% (381/682), and themetastatic lymph node ratio was 7.87% ( 1438/18 277). Lymph nodes adjacent to the cardia of stomach, laryngeal nerve, lesser curvature of stomach, cervical esophagus, left gastric artery had a higher metastatic rate, while com mon hepatic artery lymph node had a lower metastatic rate. All the common hepatic artery lymph node metastasis was accompanied with locoregional metastasis. A total of 1480 common hepatic artery lymph nodes were dissected (2 common hepatic artery lymph nodes per patient). Twenty-four patients had common hepatic artery lymph node metastasis, with the metastatic rate of 3.52% (24/682) and the lymph node ratio of 2. 16% (32/1480). The common hepatic artery lymph node metastatic rates of upper, middle and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were 2.33% (1/43), 3.76% (16/425) and 3.27% (7/217), with no significant difference (X2 = 0. 295, P 〉 0.05 ). The common hepatic artery lymph node metastatic rates of patients in T1, T2 and T3 stages were 2.35% (2/85) , 5.46% ( 10/183 ) and 2.90% ( 12/414), with no significant difference (X2 = 2. 850, P 〉 0.05 ). The common hepatic artery lymph node metastatic rates of patients with high, moderate and poor differentiated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were 0(0/63), 3.50% (16/457) and 4.94% (8/162) , with no significant difference (X2= 3. 259, P 〉 0.05). The common hepatic artery lymph node metastatic rates of patients with diameter of tumor under 3 era, 3-5 em and above 5 em were 2.59% (6/232) , 3.02% (11/364) and 8.14% (7/86), with significant difference (X2 = 6. 267, P 〈 0.05 ). The common hepatic artery lymph node metastatic rates of patients in NO, N1, N2, N3 stages were 0(0/301 ), 2.53% (5/198), 5.65% (7/124) and 20.34% ( 12/56), with significant difference (X2 = 62. 368, P 〈 0.05 ). The common hepatic artery lymph node metastatic rates of patients in stage Ⅰ , Ⅱ, Ⅲ and 1V were 0(0/62), 1.78% (6/337), 5.06% (13/257) and 19.23% (5/26), with significant difference (X2 = 25. 959, P 〈 0.05 ). Two hundred and twenty-eight patients had postoperative complications with the complication rate of 33.43% (228/682). The incidence of anastomotic fistula was the highest, which was 11.58% (79/682). Conclusions The metastatic rates of common hepatic artery lymph node in thoracic esophageal squa mous cell carcinoma is the lowest. For patients suffered from esophageal cancer in stage I or the tumor diameter under 5 cm, the dissection of common hepatic lymph node can he ommitted in surgery.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期774-778,共5页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81272608) 上海市科技启明星跟踪计划(11QH1400600)
关键词 食管肿瘤 肝总淋巴结 淋巴结清扫 Esophageal neoplasms Common hepatic artery lymph node Lymph node dissection
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin ,2011,61 (2) :69-90.
  • 2Kayani B, Zacharakis E, Ahmed K, et al. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophagea| carcinoma--a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol,2011,37(9) :747-753.
  • 3Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, et al. Operative technique aiming at en bloc dissection in esophageal surgery. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 2005,106 ( 4 ) : 275 - 279.
  • 4陈龙奇.食管癌国际TNM分期第7版解读与评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(3):237-240. 被引量:114
  • 5方文涛,陈文虎.食管癌手术治疗原则和淋巴结清扫[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(7):522-527. 被引量:45
  • 6Kosugi S, Kanda T, Yajima K, et al. Risk factors that influence early death due to cancer recurrence after extended radical esoph- agectomy with three-field lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011 . 18 (10) 2961-2967.
  • 7Chen G, Wang Z, Liu XY, et 'al. Abdominal lymph node metasta- sis in patients with mid thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcino- ma. World J Surg,2009,33(2) :278-283.
  • 8Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, et al. Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagecto- mies. Ann Surg,2001,234(4) :520-530.
  • 9Motoyanm S, Mamyama K, Sato Y, et al. Status of involved lymph nodes and direction of metastatic lymphatic flow between submuco- sal and 12-4 thoracic squamous cell esophageal cancers. World J Surg,2009,33 (3) :512-517.
  • 10Shim YM, Park JS, Lee M, et al. Can common hepatic artery lymph node dissection be safely omitted in surgery for clinical TIN0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?. Dis Esopha- gus, 2013,26(3) :272-275.

二级参考文献48

  • 1Igaki H,Tachimori Y,Kato H.Improved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection.Ann Surg,2004,239:483-490.
  • 2Fang WT,Chen WH,Chen Y,et al.Sdective three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma.Dis Esophagus,2007.20:206-211.
  • 3Zhang HL,Chen LQ,Liu RL,et al.The number of lymph node metastases influences survival and Intemational Union Against Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Dis Esophagus,2010,23:53-58.
  • 4Xiao ZF,Yang ZY,Miao YJ,et al.Influence of number of metastatic lymph nedes on survival of curative reacted thoracic esophageal cancer patients and value of radiotherapy:report of 549 cases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,62:82-90.
  • 5Mariette C,Piessen G,Briez N,et al.The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent.Ann Surg,2008.247:365-371.
  • 60'Riordan JM,Rowley S,Murphy JO,et al.Impact of solitary involved lymph node on outcome in localized cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.J Gastrointest Surg,2007,11:493-499.
  • 7诸葛雪鹏 许起荣 平育敏 等.食管癌N分级的修订:应当基于淋巴结转移的数日、距离、还足范围进行分级[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2009,16:278-282.
  • 8Oaen LQ,Xu QR,Hu C.The lymph node metastasis in esophageal carcinoma:extent is more important than number in reflecting prognosis.World J Surg,2009,33(Suppl 1):S129.
  • 9Shimada H,Okazumi S,Matsubara H,et al.Impact of the number and extent of positive lymph nodes in 200 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after three-field lymph node disseelion.Wodd J Surg,2006.30:1441-1449.
  • 10Edge SB,Byrd DR,Compton CC.el al.AJCC Cancer Staging Manual.7th ed.New York:Springer.2009.

共引文献213

同被引文献22

  • 1王峻峰,陈淑章,袁挺.食管癌切除胃食管颈部吻合与胸腔内吻合的对比分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2005,12(6):438-439. 被引量:32
  • 2Hashimoto M, Abo S, Kitamura M, et al. Resection of the poste- rior mediastinal gastric tube used in reconstruction after radical surgery for esophageal cancer---case reports [ J ]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 1995,43 (7) : 1016-1022.
  • 3Khiria LS, Pal S, Peush S, et al. Impact on outcome of the route of conduit transposition after transhiatal oesophagectomy : A ran- domized controlled trial[J]. Dig Liver Dis,2009,41 (10) :711- 716.
  • 4Singla N, Kaman L, Singh R. Anterior route reconstruction after transhiatal esophagectomy is comparable with posterior route recon- struction [ J ]. Indian J Gastroentero1,2007,26 ( 3 ) : 143-145.
  • 5Mahmoodzadeh H, Shoar S, Sirati F, et al. Early initiation of oral feeding following upper gastrointestinal tumor surgery: a random-ized controlled trial[J]. Surg Today,2015,45(2) :203-208.
  • 6Katsoulis IE, Robotis I, Kouraklis G, et al. Duodenogastrie reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up : The effect of the route of Reconstruction [ J ]. World J Surg,2005,29 ( 2 ) : 174-181.
  • 7Logeman F, Roelofs JM, Obertop H, et al. Tonic motor activity of the narrow gastric tube used as an oesophageal substitute[ J ]. Eur J Surg,2000,166(4) :301-306.
  • 8van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S,et al. Robot-assis- ted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial ( ROBOT trial) [ J ]. Trials, 2012, 13:230.
  • 9Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, et al. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal Resection [ J ]. Ann Surg,2001,233(3) :338-344.
  • 10Dter S, Soysal SD, Sto|l L, et al, Long-term quality of Lit3 ',after Ivor Lewis esophageetomy for esophageal cancer [ J ]. World J Surg,2014,38 ( 9 ) :2345-2351.

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部