摘要
唐代至清代,福建地区生产力不计其数的外销瓷。其北宋晚期至明代的青瓷产品往往被认为是模仿龙泉青瓷的制品,然而龙泉青瓷和"福建仿龙泉青瓷"间存在着诸多差别:后者质量较差,且在体现窑业技术传承的核心领域——装烧方面没有借鉴龙泉技术。本文概括了福建仿龙泉青瓷在世界各地区及沉船遗迹中的出土(水)状况,而且透过与其模仿对象的比对,揭示了二者分布的不均衡性:福建仿龙泉青瓷在东亚、东南亚市场较多,而在西亚、东非等贸易远端,龙泉青瓷则占有压倒性优势。总之,福建青瓷的输出状况验证了"根据产品质量选择输出地点"的贸易模式。这一现象也可以从贸易获利的角度得到解释。
With a survey of celadon production in Fujian region from the late Northern Song to the Ming dynasties mainly concerning the kilns and designs as well as the export trade,it turns out that the products are the copies of Longquan ware.Contrary to Longquan wares,the Fujian copies were traded to East Asia and Southeast Asia rather than to West Asia and Africa where Longquan wares sold much better for the higher quality.It is hence believed that it is nothing but quality that matters in selecting a marketplace,far or near,for any products.The economic factors are also talked about from the trading profits in the paper.
出处
《故宫博物院院刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期50-56,162,共7页
Palace Museum Journal
关键词
福建仿龙泉青瓷
龙泉青瓷
外销瓷
海外贸易模式
Fujian copies of Longquan celadon
Longquan ware
exported ceramics
patterns of international trade