摘要
从证据法学的角度看,因"狱侦耳目"袁连芳所导致的两起冤案主要涉及的是刑事诉讼中的秘密侦查制度。新刑诉法虽明确规定了秘密侦查,但颇为原则性。文章首先从张氏叔侄案视角,提出线人侦查在司法实践中存在的疑难;其次从法理视角,解析线人侦查合法性的法理基础;最后,结合司法实践,阐述线人侦查过程中搜集证据的证据能力及线人的法治规制,以更有力地控制刑事犯罪和保障人权。
From the perspective of evidence law, because "prison surveillance eyes and ears" Yuanlian Fang injustice caused by two major deals with criminal proceedings secret investigation system. Although the new Criminal Procedure Law clearly stipulates the secret investigation, but quite principled. This article first case from the perspective of Zhang nephew presented informant investigation exists in the judicial practice diffi- cult; Second, from the legal perspective, analytical legal basis for the legitimacy of the investigation inform- ant; Finally, the combination of judicial practice, elaborated informant collected during the investigation evi- dence such as competence and the rule of law, regulation informant to more effectively control the criminal and protect human rights.
出处
《云南警官学院学报》
2013年第5期70-75,共6页
The Journal of Yunnan Police College
关键词
线人侦查
合法性
法治规制
Secret Investigation
Informant Investigation
Evidence of Ability
Legitimacy
Regulation