期刊文献+

进入壁垒、策略性阻止与企业创新 被引量:23

Entry Barriers,Strategic Entry Deterrence and Enterprise Innovation
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于策略性阻止进入模型,分析进入壁垒如何影响在位企业用于进入阻止的创新行为。理论模型显示,高进入壁垒形成进入封锁,在位企业没有动力通过策略性创新投入对潜在进入者进行威慑;低进入壁垒形成进入容纳,在位企业进行威慑的创新投入成本过高;只有在临界值内中等高度的进入壁垒能促使在位企业增加创新投入威慑潜在进入者。因此,在位企业的策略性创新投入与进入壁垒高度之间呈非线性关系,过高或过低的进入壁垒都导致企业降低创新投入。利用中国制造业2005-2007年482个四位码细分行业的面板数据对上述结论进行实证分析的结果显示,进入壁垒与中国工业企业创新投入之间存在显著"倒U型"关系,基于样本、变量和模型的稳健性检验显示上述结果仍然成立。结论暗示,中等进入壁垒高度带来的潜在竞争压力有利于增加中国制造业企业的创新投入。 Based on strategic entry deterrence model, this paper analyzes how entry barriers influence the innovation pattern of incumbents. The theoretical model demonstrates that high barriers to entry deter entry and frustrate the incumbents in threatening potential entrants through strategic innovation investment; the low entry barriers constitute admission to entry and also deter the innovation investment for high cost; only medium barriers ranging between critical values promote the incumbents to threaten potential entrants through strategic innovation investment. Therefore the relationship between firm' s strategic innovation investment and entry barriers is nonlinear, which means that both high and low entry barriers decrease the innovation investment of an incumbent. An empirical analysis is performed using a panel data of 482 four - digit code manufacturing industries of China during the period of 2005 -2007,which reveals an inverted - U relationship between entry barriers and innovation investment in China' s manufacturing industry. Robustness tests based on sample, variables and model are also performed and the result remains robust. The result implies that the potential competitive pressure from medium entry barriers promote China' s manufacturing firms to invest on innovation.
作者 叶林 曾国安
出处 《经济评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期61-67,78,共8页 Economic Review
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"对外贸易 资源消耗与经济增长的实证分析"(项目编号:08CJL023)和国家社科基金青年项目"我国重要能源资源需求的投入产出分析和非线性预测研究"(项目编号:13CJY043)的资助
关键词 进入壁垒 进入阻止 创新投入 倒U型关系 Barriers to Entry Entry Deterrence Innovation Investment Inverted - U Relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Aghion, P. , Nicholas Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, and Peter Howitt. 2004. "Competition and Innovation : An Inverted U Relationship. " NBER Working Paper Series 9269.
  • 2Bagwell, K. , and G. Ramey. 1996. "Capacity, Entry and Forward Induction. "Rand Journal of Economics ,27 (4) :660 - 680.
  • 3Bagwell, K. 1990. "Informational Product Differentiation as a Barrier to Entry. " International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8(2) :207 -223.
  • 4Caves, R. E. ,J. K. Shirazi, and M. E. Porter. 1975. "Scale Economies in Statistical Analyses of Market Power. "Review of Economics and Statistics,57(2) : 133 - 140.
  • 5Eaton,B. C. ,and R. G. Lipsey. 1950. " Exit Barriers Are Entry Barriers:The Durability of Capital as a Barrier to Entry. " The Bell Journal of Economics, 11 ( 2 ) : 721 - 729.
  • 6Furukawa, Y. 2010. "Intellectual Property Protection and Innovation. "Economics Letters, 109(2) :99 -101.
  • 7Gilbert, R. , and D. Newbery. 1982. " Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly. "American Economic Review, 72 (2) : 514 - 526.
  • 8Guth, L. 1971. "Advertising and Market Structure : Revisited. "Journal of Industrial Economics, 19 ( 2 ) : 179 - 198.
  • 9Khemani, R. S. 1987. "The Determinants of Entry and Exit Reconsidered. "International Journal of Industrial Organization, 5 ( 1 ) : 15 - 26.
  • 10Lunn, J. 1989. " R&D, Concentration and Advertising: A Simultaneous Equations Model. " Managerial and Decision Economics, 10(2) :101 - 105.

同被引文献421

引证文献23

二级引证文献209

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部