摘要
比较了 16 %恶线清WP(咪鲜安 +杀螟丹 )和 2 5 %施保克EC(咪鲜安 )防治水稻恶苗病的效果。结果显示 ,恶线清浸种对水稻恶苗病的防治效果与施保克没有差异 ,因其具有使用方便 ,且可兼治水稻干尖线虫病的特点 。
In the paper, 16% Exianqing WP (prochloraz+cartap) and 25% Sportak EC (prochloraz) were compared in the effect on controlling rice bakanaea disease caused by Fusarium moniliforme. The results indicated two fungicides were not significant difference in controlling rice baknaeae disease. Exianqing could control rice white tip caused by Aphelenchoides besseyi. It was potential superiority in popularizing of controlling rice seed-borne diseases.
出处
《安徽农业科学》
CAS
2000年第6期765-766,共2页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences