期刊文献+

基于模糊AHP和证据理论的混合决策模型 被引量:4

Group based product scheme evaluation model based on fuzzy AHP and evidential reasoning theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对模糊层次分析法(Fuzzy AHP,FAHP)用于产品方案评价时存在的逆向排序问题和不确定信息处理问题,分析其原因后将不确定性推理的证据推理(Evidential Reasoning,ER)理论引入FAHP的层次结构进行底层方案评价值的计算,在此基础上提出了FAHP-ER混合决策模型,该模型由于ER的引入而大大提高了它在不确定信息处理方面的能力,从而克服了FAHP方法对不确定信息处理不足的问题。用一个轴承转子系统设计方案的评价实例对混合决策模型进行了验证,很好地处理了方案评价过程中决策者的各种主观不确定信息,在此基础上获得了最佳的转子设计方案。 In view of two problems existing in FAHP,one is rank reversal problem and another is the limited capability in dealing with uncertainty.When it is applied to evaluation and selection for product schemes,this paper intends to treat criterion weights and performance scores of alternatives on criteria separately and introduce Evidential Reasoning(ER)theory,which is good at uncertain reasoning,into the systematic framework of FAHP to calculate the performance scores of alternatives.Then a hybrid group based decision model FAHP-ER is proposed by combining both FAHP and ER approach together,which enhances capability of FAHP in dealing with uncertainty,another weakness in FAHP,due to introduction of ER algorithm.A case study for rotor and bearing system scheme evaluation is presented to demonstrate the application of hybrid decision model and finally a reasonable rotor system scheme is obtained.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 2013年第18期232-236,共5页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863)(No.2007AA04Z121)
关键词 模糊层次分析法 逆向排序 证据理论 方案评价 轴承转子系统 fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) rank reversal evidential reasoning theory scheme evaluation rotor and bearing system
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Belton N,Gear A E.On a shortcoming of saaty’s method of analysis hierarchies[J].Omega,1983,11(3):143-144.
  • 2李艳凯,张俊容.TOPSIS法应用中的逆序问题[J].科技导报,2008,26(7):47-50. 被引量:15
  • 3Triantaphyllou E.Multi-criteria decision making methods:a comparative study[M].Boston,MA,USA:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2000.
  • 4Beynonm M.The D-S theory of evidential:an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modeling[J].Omega,2000,28(1):37-50.
  • 5Yang J B,Xu D L.On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainty[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans,2002,32(3):289-304.
  • 6Yang J B,Xu D L.Nonlinear information aggregation via evidential reasoning in multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans,2002,32(3):376-393.
  • 7杨明顺,林志航,李言,李鹏阳,袁启龙.产品总体方案评价与优选的证据推理决策[J].工程图学学报,2006,27(2):32-38. 被引量:2
  • 8王宏,曹岩,赵汝嘉.面向总体方案决策的产品评价[J].制造业自动化,2000,22(5):17-19. 被引量:3

二级参考文献11

共引文献17

同被引文献42

  • 1郭成城,晏蒲柳.一种异构Web服务器集群动态负载均衡算法[J].计算机学报,2005,28(2):179-184. 被引量:72
  • 2李斌,陈以,韩元杰.模糊证据理论综述[J].兵工自动化,2005,24(3):79-81. 被引量:6
  • 3叶清,吴晓平,刘玲艳.基于BP神经网络的D-S证据理论及其应用[J].海军工程大学学报,2007,19(2):63-67. 被引量:9
  • 4王雪华.两种层次结构化决策方法的理论与应用研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2005.
  • 5吴晓平,叶清,刘玲艳.基于改进的BP网络的D-S证据理论及其应用[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,29(8):158-161. 被引量:6
  • 6Larroca F,Rougier J L.Minimum delay load-balancing via nonparametric regression and no-regret algorithms[J].Com- puter Networks, 2012,56(4) : 1152-1166.
  • 7Son K, Chong S, Veciana G.Dynamic association for load balancing and interference avoidance in multi-cell net- works[J].Wireless Communications,2009,8(7) :3566-3576.
  • 8Wang Lei, Liang Heng, Bai Fengshan, et al.A load balancing strategy for parallel computation of sparse permanents[J]. Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, 2012, 19 (6) : 1017-1030.
  • 9Satty T L.How to make a decision the analytic hierarchy process[J].Interfaces, 1994,24( 6 ) : 19-43.
  • 10Ishizaka A, Labib A.Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2011,38( 11 ) : 14336-14345.

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部