期刊文献+

论著作权法替代责任制度——兼评我国立法相关条款的完善 被引量:4

On Vicarious Liability Rules of Copyright Law——Reviewing Related Regulations Perfection of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为民法侵权责任法中的重要制度,替代责任主要适用于雇佣和监护关系,体现了民法保护弱势群体、合理分配不幸损害的价值理念。在著作权领域,美国率先通过判例引入替代责任,并逐渐将适用这一规则的案件类型化,为著作权保护提供了极大的便利。著作权替代责任制度不仅体现了法的公平正义价值取向,也符合法的经济效率要求。我国《信息网络传播权保护条例》第22条第4款是关于替代责任的规定,但其责任构成要件存在缺陷,给网络服务提供商施加了过重的监督控制义务,且与间接侵权规则相冲突。网络环境下建立著作权替代责任规则,需要分析网络中经营者所处的地位,评估其盈利来源和监督控制能力,避免干扰其正常的经营活动。 Vicarious Liability, as an important rule in the traditional civil tort law, primarily used in em ployer employee relationship, guardianship relationship, reflects the values of civil law protecting the inter ests of vulnerable parties and seeking a reasonable distribution of unfortunately harm. The United States copy fight law, also through cases introduced this rules, gradually identified types of vicarious liability cases, bring ing the judicial protection of copyright with great convenience. Vicarious liability in the field of copyright law not only reflects the law' s moral values of fairness and justice, but also meets the requirements of economic ef ficiency. Article 22 of paragraph 4 in China the Right of Communication through Information Network Regula tions are about vicarious liability rules, but its liability requirements has defects, putting Internet service pro riders overweight supervision and control obligation, and conflicting with indirect infringement rule. When es tablishing the copyright vicarious liability rules under Network environment, we need analyze the status of net work operators, assess their source of profit and supervision control ability and avoid interference with its nor mal business activities.
作者 姚鹤徽
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期67-74,共8页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 湖南省重点学科建设项目资助
关键词 著作权侵权 间接责任 替代责任 信息网络传播权保护条例 著作权法 copyright infringement secondary copyright liability vicarious liability the right of com-munication through information network regulations copyright law
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1Black’8 Law Dictionary,7^th Edition,West Group,1999,P.927.
  • 2The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and The Law,Edited by Peter Newman,UK,1998,P.637.
  • 3Lawnchburg v.Morgans[1971]2Q.B,P.254.
  • 4《日本民法典》第715条.
  • 5Black’s Law Dictionary,P.544.
  • 6Gold v.Essex eoumtyy Coumcil[1942]2K.B,P.305.
  • 7Stevenson v.Macdonald[1952]1T.L.T,P.111.
  • 8Century Insurance Co v.Northen Ireland Road Transport Board[1942]A.C,p.509.
  • 9《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》第76条.
  • 10学者起草.《中国民法典·侵权行为编草案建议稿》第54条.

共引文献25

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部