期刊文献+

基于DEA的废水治理效率评估方法及其应用 被引量:12

Method for efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment and application based on DEA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于数据包络分析(DEA)模型,以废水处理设施年度运行费用、工业污染源废水治理完成投资和城市环境基础设施建设污水处理投资为投入指标,以工业用水重复利用量、工业废水COD去除量和城市污水处理厂处理量为产出指标,利用2003—2010年我国26个地区的面板数据对湖北省废水治理效率进行评估。结果表明:2010年该省废水治理相对总效率比2003年提高53%;3项产出不足值变化情况基本一致,且具有可同步、均衡提升的特点。马奎斯特全要素生产率指数(Malmquist TFP)计算结果显示湖北省废水治理效率变化指数累积值为1.529,远大于废水治理技术变化指数累计值0.929,表明该省废水治理绩效提升的主导因素是优化了废水治理投入产出配置。 The efficiency of wastewater treatment in Hubei Province, China was analyzed using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. The model' s inputs included the annual expenditure for the operation of wastewater treatment equipment and the investment completed in pollution treatment of industrial wastewater and sewage treatment for urban environmental infrastructure construction, and its outputs included the quantity of industrial recycled water use, the amount of COD removed from industrial wastewater, and the quantity of wastewater treated in wastewater treatment plants. Panel data from 26 districts of China from 2003 to 2010 were employed. The results show that the CRS technical efficiency increased by 53% in 2010 compared with 2003. The deficiency of the three outputs varied consistently. The calculation result of the Malmquist TFP index shows that the cumulative value of the wastewater treatment efficiency change for Hubei Province was 1. 529, which was much higher than the cumulative value of the technical change (0. 929 ), indicating that the dominant factor in the improvement of the wastewater treatment efficiency was the optimized allocation of inputs and outputs.
出处 《水资源保护》 CAS 2013年第4期77-81,共5页 Water Resources Protection
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2009ZX07631-03)
关键词 数据包络分析 废水治理 政策评估 效率分析 data envelopment analysis (DEA) wastewater treatment policy assessment efficiency analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1贺桂珍,吕永龙.太湖水污染防治计划实施效率评估[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):6348-6354. 被引量:5
  • 2王宝顺,刘京焕.中国地方城市环境治理财政支出效率评估研究[J].城市发展研究,2011,18(4):71-76. 被引量:23
  • 3黄和平,伍世安,智颖飙,姚冠荣,江民锦,周早弘.基于生态效率的资源环境绩效动态评估——以江西省为例[J].资源科学,2010,32(5):924-931. 被引量:47
  • 4CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2 (6) : 429 -444.
  • 5COELLI T. A guide to DEAP version 2. 1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program [ R ]. Armidale : Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) of University of New England, 1997.
  • 6FARE R, GROSSKOPF S, NORRIS M, et al. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries [ J ]. The American Economic Review, 1994,84( 1 ) : 66-83.
  • 7FARE R, GROSSKOPF S, LINDGREN B, et al. Productivity changes in Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989: a non- parametric Malmquist approach [ J ]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992,3 : 85-101.

二级参考文献27

共引文献72

同被引文献115

引证文献12

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部