期刊文献+

层次分析法和德尔菲法在PACS评估体系构建中的应用 被引量:16

Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Delphi Technique in Establishing PACS Evaluation System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:应用层次分析法和德尔菲法建立PACS评估体系。方法:邀请包括医学影像学、计算机应用、生物医学工程学、PACS项目管理、临床医疗的专家9名,采用德尔菲法建立评估体系的指标框架,采用层次分析法确定评估体系各级指标权重。结果:构建的评估体系包括一级指标5个、二级指标23个。5个一级指标即供应商综合能力、产品成熟性与先进性、系统安全性与可靠性、系统准确性和系统性能的权重分别为0.091 7、0.224 7、0.232 6、0.181 0、0.270 0;二级指标组合权重按权重大小排序,权重最大的前5位分别是工作站性能、系统存储与影像存档性能、影像质量及显示性能、数据的完整性和数据安全策略。各级指标权重均满足一致性检验,所得权重是可以接受的。结论:德尔菲法和层次分析法是建立评估体系的可行、有效方法。 Objective To develop a new PACS evaluation system by using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Delphi Technique.Methods Nine experts of medical imaging,computer application,biomedical engineering,PACS project management and clinical medicine were included in the development of the system,which used Delphi Technique to establish the index framework and Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine the weights of the indexes.Results The system involved in 5 first-class indexes and 23 second-class indexes.The first-class indexes consisted of supplier's comprehensive capability,product maturity and progressiveness,system safety and reliability,system accuracy as well as system performance,which were gifted with the weights of 0.091 7,0.224 7,0.232 6,0.181 0 and 0.270 0,respectively.The second-class indexes were sorted based on the weights,and the five ones with the highest weights were workstation,system storage and picture archiving,image quality and display,data integrity as well as data security strategy.All classes of indexes were consonant with the consistency test,and all weights were acceptable.Conclusion Analytic Hierarchy Process and Delphi Technique can be used for the establishment of the evaluation system.
出处 《医疗卫生装备》 CAS 2013年第9期6-8,共3页 Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
基金 2013年度黄石市科技攻关项目
关键词 层次分析法 德尔菲法 图像存档与传输系统 评估体系 analytic hierarchy process Delphi technique PACS evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1朱超,缑文海,王福义,邵耀来.大中型医院PACS建设的经验与建议[J].医疗卫生装备,2012,33(7):47-48. 被引量:2
  • 2陈钧.2009年中国PACS发展研究报告[J].中国信息界(e医疗),2009,11:39-51.
  • 3平卫伟,谭红专.Delphi法的研究进展及其在医学中的应用[J].疾病控制杂志,2003,7(3):243-246. 被引量:269
  • 4Scholl A,Manthey L,helm R,et cd. Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis:an empirical comparison[J]. Eur J Oper Res ,2005,164(3) :760-777.
  • 5Ijzerman M J ,van Til J A ,Bridges J F. Comparison of analytic hier- archy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation[J]. Patient, 2012,5 ( 1 ) : 45-56.
  • 6Reinhardt U. Divide et impera: protecting the growth of health care incomes(COSTS)[J]. Health Eeon,2012,21 (1) :41-54.
  • 7王以彭,李结松,刘立元.层次分析法在确定评价指标权重系数中的应用[J].第一军医大学学报,1999,19(4):377-379. 被引量:112
  • 8薄斌,程洋,何黎升,刘彦普,赵晋龙,周树夏.基于层次分析法和专家咨询法建立颌面部损伤严重度评价方法[J].中华创伤杂志,2008,24(2):136-140. 被引量:3
  • 9Joshi V ,Lee K,Melson D ,et d. Empirical investigation of radiolo- gists" priorities for PACS selection:an analytical hierarchy process approach[J]. J Digit Imaging, 2011,24 (4) : 700-708.
  • 10Peechia L,Martin J L,Ragozzino A,et al. User needs elicitation via analytic hierarchy process (AHP). A ease study on a Computed To- mography(CT) scanner[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2013,13 (1):2-12.

二级参考文献17

共引文献380

同被引文献132

引证文献16

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部