期刊文献+

PCI和药物治疗血流储备分数处于临界值的单纯左前降支近端中度狭窄效果的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of PCI and medical treatment for moderate stenosis in isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery patients with fractional flow reserve at critical value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨血流储备分数( FFR)处于临界值的单纯左前降支近端中度狭窄患者治疗方案的选择。方法:选择50例冠状动脉造影显示单纯左前降支近端中度狭窄(50%~70%)且FFR处于临界值(0.75~0.80)的患者,分为两组,一组行经皮冠状动脉介入( PCI)治疗,另一组行药物保守治疗。随访2 a,观察两组患者主要不良心血管事件(心源性猝死、非致死性心肌梗死、再行PCI)的发生率及2 a后左前降支近端的狭窄程度。结果:PCI治疗组和药物治疗组主要不良心血管事件的发生率分别为9.1%(2/22)和10.7%(3/28),差异无统计学意义(P >0.999);2 a后血管狭窄程度分别降低了(9±2)%和(8±3)%,差异亦无统计学意义(t=0.492,P>0.05)。结论:FFR处于临界值的单纯左前降支近端中度狭窄患者介入治疗和药物保守治疗的近期预后无差别。 Aim:To compare the efficacy of PCI and medical treatment for moderate stenosis in isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery patients with fractional flow reserve at critical value .Methods:Fifty patients, who had isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery moderate stenosis ( 50%-70%) with intermediate fractional flow reserve between 0.75 and 0.80, were enrolled.Twenty-two patients(PCI group) were treated with PCI combined with opti-mal medical therapy , and the other 28 patients ( medical-therapy group ) were treated by optimal medical therapy .After a 2-year follow-up, the occurrence of the major adverse cardiovascular events ( MACE) and the stenosis rate of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery were observed .Results:The occurrence of MACE of PCI group and the medical-thera-py group was 9.1%and 10.7%, the stenosis rates decreased by (9 ±2)%and (8 ±3)%,and there were no differences between the two groups(t=0.492,P〉0.05).Conclusion:For patients with moderate stenosis and intermediate fractional flow reserve(0.75-0.80), there is no difference in efficacy of PCI and medical-therapy.
出处 《郑州大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第5期681-683,共3页 Journal of Zhengzhou University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 血流储备分数 左前降支近端 中度狭窄 介入治疗 药物治疗 fractional flow reserve left anterior descending coronary artery moderate stenosis PCI medical therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kern M J, Lerman A, Bech JW, et al. Physiological assess- ment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheteriza- tion laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interven- tional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiol- ogy[ J]. Circulation, 2006,114(12) :1321.
  • 2Kern MJ ,Samady H. Current concepts of integrated coro-nary physiology in the catheterization laboratory[ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010, 55(3) :173.
  • 3Park S J, Ahn JM, Kang SJ. Paradigm shift to functional angioplasty: new insights for fractional flow reserve and in- travascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary inter- vention[J]. Circulation, 2011,124(8): 951.
  • 4Puymirat E, Muller O, Sharif F, et al. Fractional flow re- serve:concepts, applications and use in France in 2010 [J]. Arch Cardiovasc Dis, 2010,103(11/12):615.
  • 5Verna E, Lattanzio M, Ghiringhelli S, et al. Performing ver- sus deferring coronary angioplasty based an functional eval- uation of vessel stenosis by pressure measurements : a clini- cal outcome study [ J ]. J Cardiovasc Med, 2006,7 ( 3 ) : 169.
  • 6Dijls NH, Van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Per- cutaneous Coronary intervention of functionally nonsignifi- cant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFFER study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49(2) :2105.
  • 7Muller O, Mangiacapra F, Ntalianis A,et al. Long-term fol- low-up after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment strate- gy in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior de- scending coronary artery stenosis[J]. JACC Cardiovasc In- terv ,2011,4 ( 11 ) : 1175.
  • 8Lindstaedt M, Halilcavusogullari Y, Yazar A, et al. Clinical outcome following conservative vs revascularization therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease and border- line fractional flow reserve measurements[ J]. Clin Cardiol, 2010, 33(2) :77.
  • 9Courtis J, Rodes-Cabau J, Larose E, et al. Comparison of medical treatment and coronary revascularization in patients with moderate coronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements[ J]. Catheter Cardiorasc Interv, 2008, 71(4) :541.
  • 10Tani S,Watanabe I, Kobari C, et al. Mismatch between re- sults of myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) measure- ments and myocardial perfusion SPECT for identification of the severity of ischemia [ J ]. Jpn Heart J,2004,45 ( 5 ) :867.

同被引文献16

  • 1侯旭敏,方唯一,仇兴标,陈晖,袁方,关韶峰.冠脉临界病变的评价[J].中国心血管病研究,2006,4(9):673-674. 被引量:7
  • 2无.慢性稳定性心绞痛诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(3):195-206. 被引量:2090
  • 3Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/ AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable isehemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2012, 60 (24) : e44- e64.
  • 4Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris : executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology [J]. Eur Heart J, 2006, 27 (11) : 1341 - 1381.
  • 5Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011, 58 (24) : ed4 -e122.
  • 6Mints GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consenus document on standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting Intravascular Ultrasound studies (IUVS) : a Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents [ J ]. AM Coil Cardial, 2001, 37 (5): 1479-1491.
  • 7Chamuleau SA, Meuwissen M, Koch KT, et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2002, 89 (4): 377-380.
  • 8Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [ J ]. Circulation, 1993, 87 (4): 1354-1367.
  • 9Yoshida K, Akasaka T, Yoshikama J. Assement of coronnary stenosis severtity by a Doppler guide wire [J]. Jpn Circ J, 1995, 58 (suppl4) : 199 -203.
  • 10Caymaz O, Fak AS, Tezcan H, et al. Correlation of myocardial fractional flow reserve with thallium - 201 SPECT imaging in intermediate - severity coronary artery lesions [ J ]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2000, 12 (7): 345-350.

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部