期刊文献+

胃癌组织和循环miR-21与胃癌伊立替康敏感性关系的初步研究 被引量:4

Circulating and tumor miR-21 could predict irinotecan sensitivity in gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:肿瘤组织和细胞中的miR-21先后被证实与肿瘤对化疗药物的敏感性有关,高表达miR-21提示肿瘤对多种化疗药物不敏感。外周血蕴含丰富的肿瘤信息,为个体化药物治疗提供了新的检测来源。本研究初步探讨胃癌组织和血浆循环miR21表达水平与胃癌铂类药物和伊立替康敏感性之间的关系。方法:系统收集35例经病理确诊的新鲜人胃癌标本,采用三维微组织块培养法行两种药物的体外敏感试验;实时荧光定量PCR检测血浆和对应胃癌石蜡组织中miR-21表达水平。结果:血浆miR21与对应肿瘤组织miR-21呈正相关(rho=O.736,P〈0.001)。血浆miR-21水平与性别、年龄、病理类型、分化程度、淋巴结转移、TNM分期、肿瘤部位无统计学相关性,但是II期和III期的miR-21水平较I期有偏高的趋势。铂类药物敏感组与耐药组肿瘤组织miR-21相对表达量分别为1.32(95%CI:0.73-1.90)和4.06(95%CI:1.71~6.41),差异无统计学意义(P=0.004);铂类药物敏感组与耐药组血浆miR-21相对表达量分别为5.25(95%CI:0.14~10.64)和5.82(95%,差异无统计学意义a:2.27~9.37),差异无统计学意义(P-0.19)。伊立替康敏感组与耐药组肿瘤组织miR-21相对表达量分别为1.09(95%CI:0.65~1.54)和4.94(95%CI:2.44~7.44),差异无统计学意义(P〈0.001);伊立替康敏感组与耐药组血浆miR-21JfN对表达量分别为1.86(95%CI:1.08~2.64)和12.42(95%CI:3.14~21.70)差异无统计学意义(P=0.001)。结论:血浆循环miR-21与对应肿瘤组织miR-2l水平呈显著正相关,在一定程度上能反映肿瘤组织miR-21的水平。血浆miR-21水平与新鲜胃癌组织对伊立替康的敏感性呈负相关,肿瘤组织miR-2l水平与新鲜胃癌组织对伊立替康和铂类药物的敏感性呈负相关。 Background and purpose: Mir-21 has been demonstrated high expressed in many kinds of tumor tissues and cell lines. High expressed miR-21 leads to chemoresistance. Circulating miRNA is a novel biomarker for chemosensitivity prediction. The aim of our study was to investigate the role of plasma and tumor miR-21 levels as predictive biomarkers for irinotecan in gastric cancer. Methods: The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) was used to determine irinotecan and cisplatin sensitivity on 35 freshly removed gastric tumor specimens, miR-21 expressions in tumor and plasma were determined by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Results: Plasma miR-21 was closely correlated with corresponding miR-21 mRNA level in tumor tissues (rho=0.736, P〈0.001) and was not correlated with sex, age, pathology type, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage or tumor location. Patients with stage Ⅱ- Ⅲ had higher miR-21 levels. The tumor miR-21 expressions in cisplatin- sensitive group and resistant group were 1.32 (95%CI: 0.73-1.90) and 4.06 (95%CI: 1.71-6.41)(P=0.004), respectively. The plasma miR-21 expressions in cisplatin-sensitive group and resistant group were 5.25 (95% CI: O. 14-10.64) and5,82 (95%CI: 2.27-9.37)(P=0.19). The tumor miR-21 expressions in irinotecan-sensitive group and resistant group were 1.09 (95%CI: 0.65-l.54) and 4.94 (95%CI: 2.44-7.44)(P〈0.001), respectively. The plasma miR-21 expressions in irinotecan-sensitive group and resistant group were 1.86 (95%CI: 1.08-2.64) and 12.42 (95%CI: 3.14-21.70)(P=0.001). Conclusion: A significant correlation was observed between plasma and tumor miR-21 level. The low plasma miR- 2l level could benefit from treatment with irinotecan. And low tumor miR-21 expression correlated with increased irinotecan and cisplatin response rate.
出处 《中国癌症杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期744-750,共7页 China Oncology
关键词 胃癌 三维微组织块培养法 循环miR-21 铂类 伊立替康 Gastric cancer Histoculture drug response assay Circulating miR-21 Cisplatin Irinotecan
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1Duffy MJ. Clinical uses of tumor markers: a critical review. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2001; 38:225-262.
  • 2Thomas CM, Sweep CG. Serum tumor markers: past, state of the art, and future, lnt J Biol Markers 2001; 16:73-86.
  • 3Duffy MJ. Role of tumor markers in patients with solid cancers: a critical review. Eur J lntern Med 2007; 18:175-184.
  • 4Roulston JE. Limitations of tumour markers in screening. Br J Surg 1990; 77:961-962.
  • 5Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6:259-269.
  • 6Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 2006; 6:857-866.
  • 7Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer A J, et al. Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:e179.
  • 8Tang F, Hajkova P, Barton SC, Lao K, Surani MA. MicroRNA expression profiling of single whole embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:e9.
  • 9Hafner M, Landgraf P, Ludwig J, et al. Identification of microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs using cDNA library sequencing. Methods 2008; 44:3-12.
  • 10Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:2257-2261.

共引文献1056

同被引文献47

  • 1汤蕾,张吉翔,熊瑛.人着色性干皮病D组基因的克隆及其真核表达[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2008,25(3):668-672. 被引量:12
  • 2马卓娅,汤华,李欣,刘民,吴海东,王晶.MicroRNA在6种肿瘤细胞中的表达差异[J].中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2007,14(3):254-258. 被引量:8
  • 3WANG Z, CAI Q, JIANG Z, et al. Prognostic role of MicroRNA-21 in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis [ J ] . Med Sci Monit, 2014, 15(20): 1668-1674.
  • 4PEACOCK O, LEE A C, CAMERON F, et al. Inflammation and miR-21 pathways functionally interact to downregulate PDCD4 in colorectal cancer [ J ] . 2014, 13, 9(10): e110267.
  • 5MENG X R, LU P, MEI J Z, et al. Expression analysis of miRNA and target mRNAs in esophageal cancer [ J ] . Braz J Med Biol Res, 2014, 47(9): 811-817.
  • 6YU Y, KANWAR S S, PATEL B B, et al. MicroRNA-21 induces stemness by downregnlating transforming growth factor beta receptor 2 (TGF 13 R2) in colon cancer cells [ J ] . Carcinogenesis, 2012, 33(1): 68-76.
  • 7REN Q, LIANG J, WEI J, et al. Epithelial and stromal expression of miRNAs during prostate cancer progression [ J ] . Am J Transl Res, 2014, 6(4): 329-339.
  • 8FALTEJSKOVA P, BESSE A, SEVCIKOVA S, et al. Clinical correlations of miR-21 expression in colorectal cancer patients and effects of its inhibition on DLD1 colon cancer cells [ J ] . Int J Colorectal Dis, 2012, 27(11): 1401-1408.
  • 9YET T, YANG Y L, LIU X Y, et al. Prognostic value of circulating microRNA-21 in digestive system cancers: a recta-analysis [ J ] . Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014, 7(4): 873- 878.
  • 10XIONG B, CHENG Y, MA L, et al. miR-21 regulates biological behavior through the PTEN/PI-3 K/Akt signaling pathway in human colorectal cancer cells [ J ] . Int J Oncol, 2013, 42(1): 219-228.

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部