期刊文献+

后腹腔镜肾切除术的安全性及疗效评估(附1000例报告) 被引量:5

Safety and efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy(Report of 1000 cases)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:总结本组后腹腔镜肾切除术的经验,评价该手术的安全性及疗效。方法:回顾性分析本组2004年3月~2012年4月1000例后腹腔镜肾切除术患者的临床资料。男537例,女463例。平均年龄57(16~86)岁。根治性肾切除术645例,肾输尿管全长切除术245例,单纯性肾切除术110例。结果:中转开放手术14例。平均手术时间110(70~320)min(不包括肾输尿管全长切除术中输尿管末端的处理),平均术中出血量为80(20~830)ml。术后平均肠功能恢复时间23(18~43)h,术后平均下床活动时间24(19~47)h,术后拔除引流管平均时间50(36~72)h,术后平均住院时间7(5.5~10.0)d。输血15例。术中静脉损伤8例,动脉损伤4例;术后6例发生严重并发症。结论:后腹腔镜肾切除术适应证广、手术效果好,但仍有发生严重并发症的可能性。 Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. Method: The retrospective analysis was performed on 1 000 consecutive patients underwent retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy from March 2004 to April 2012. There were 537 male and 463 female patients with the average age of 57 (16-86) years. Radical nephrectomies were performed for 645 patients while ureteronephrectomies for 245 patients and simple nephrectomies for n0 cases. Result: Fourteen cases were converted to open surgery due to severe adhesion and severe bleeding. The mean operative time was 110 (70-320) rain (except for excision of the end of ureter in ureteronephrectomy). The medium estimated blood loss was 80 (20-830) ml. The mean drainage time was 50 (36- 72) h. The mean time of recovery of intestinal function was 23 (18-43) h and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7 (5.5-10.0) d. Fifteen cases required blood transfusion, lntraoperative complications mainly include four re- nal artery iniuries and eight vein injuries. There were six patients with severe complications postoperatively. Con- clusion: Despite of potential complications retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is safe and effective.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2013年第10期729-731,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 后腹腔镜 肾切除术 并发症 retroperitoneoscope nephrectomy complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Clayman R V,Kavoussi L R, Soper N J,et al. Lapa-roscopic nephrectomy; initial case reportQ]. J Urol,1991,146(2): 278-282.
  • 2郑军华鄢阳彭波巢月根许云飞张海民高其若黄建华.腹腔镜下T2大体积肾癌根治术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2010,31(3):157-160. 被引量:12
  • 3OnoY,Hattori R,Gotoh M, et al. Laparoscopic radi-cal nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: the standardof care alreadyCJ]. Curr Opin Urol, 2005,15(2) ; 75-78.
  • 4Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al-Zahrani H, et al. Pro-spective randomized controlled study: transperitoneallaparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical ne-phrectomy[J]. Urology, 2004,64(5) : 919 - 924,.
  • 5Albqami N,Janetsehek G. Indications and contraindi-cations for the use of laparoseopic surgery for renal cellcarcinoma[J]. Nat Clin Pract UroU 2006,3(1) : 3Z -37.
  • 6Steinnerd L E, Vardi I Y, Bhayani S B. Laparoscopicradical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma with knownlevel I renal vein tumor thrombus[J]. Urology, 2007 ,69(4); 662-665.
  • 7高江平,郭刚,朱捷,王威,徐阿祥,董隽,洪宝发.后腹腔镜肾切除术快速寻找肾血管的方法[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(3):172-174. 被引量:36
  • 8张楠,单中杰,韩前河.后腹腔镜下肾蒂解剖定位的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2011,32(9):614-616. 被引量:18
  • 9Ponsky L,Cherullo E,Moinzadeh A, et al. The Hem-o-lok clip is safe for laparoscopic nephrectomy: a multi-institutional review[J]. Urology, 2008,71(4): 593 -596.
  • 10Simforoosh N,Sarhangnejad R,Basiri A,et al. Vas-cular clips are safe and a great cost-effective techniquefor arterial and venous control in laparoscopic nephrec-tomy: single-center experience with 1 834 laparoscopicnephrectomies[J]. J Endourol, 2012,26(8): 1009 一1012.

二级参考文献20

  • 1张楠,翟振波,金雷,秦卫军,杨波,张运涛,杨力军,王禾,袁建林.Hem-o-lok在后腹腔镜解剖性根治性肾切除术中的应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(12):1233-1234. 被引量:12
  • 2马潞林,黄毅,田晓军,侯小飞,赵磊,卢剑,洪锴.后腹腔镜根治性肾癌切除术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):157-159. 被引量:76
  • 3Albqami N, Janetschek G. Indications and contraindications for the use of laparoscopic surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Nat Clin Pract Urol, 2006, 3:32-37.
  • 4Simon SD, Castle EP, Ferrigni RG, et al. Complication of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience. J Urol, 2004, 171:1447- 1450.
  • 5Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Skriapas K, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomyfor large renal cell carcinomain clinical stagec T2 or cT3a : quality of life, pain and reeonvaleseenee. Eur Urol, 2006, 49:314-323.
  • 6Highshaw RA, Vakar Lopez F, Jonasch E, el al. Port site metastasis: the influence of biology. Eur Urol, 2005, 47 : 357-360.
  • 7Steinberg AP, Finelli A, Desai MM, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephreetomy for large (Greater than 7cm, T2 ) renal tumors. J Urol, 2004, 172:2172-2176.
  • 8Takaaki I, Kinoshita H, Satou M, et al. Complications of urologic laparoscopic surgery: a single institute experience of 1017 proce- dures. J Endourol, 2010, 24: 253-260.
  • 9Liapis D, de la Taille A, Ploussard G, et al. Analysis of complica- tions from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years. World J Urol, 2008, 26: 523-530.
  • 10Clayman R V, Kavoussi L R, Soper N J, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report[J]. J Urol,1991, 146:278.

共引文献53

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部