期刊文献+

传感器故障下的航天器状态监测与故障识别 被引量:3

State Monitoring and Fault Identification for Spacecraft under Sensor Fault
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对航天器上传感器故障可能导致状态估计错误的问题,提出了一种基于证据理论的多传感器融合与故障识别方法。该方法采用证据距离与冲突质量的乘积来度量证据间的冲突大小。在证据的融合中先根据冲突大小计算每个证据的可信度,并根据可信度大小修正证据,再用D-S规则进行融合。该冲突度量方法综合了证据间目标一致性与整体差异性的影响,在具有较强的不确定性和不可靠性的情况下,比仅采用证据距离或冲突质量来度量证据间冲突的大小更加准确。将其应用于微小卫星电源系统的状态监测,实验结果表明该方法可以有效地监测系统状态并正确地识别故障传感器,准确度优于其它方法。 As sensor fault on spacecraft may lead to state estimation error, a new method based on evidence theory is proposed for multi-sensor fusion and fault sensor identification. A new metric defined as the product of two evidences' conflict mass and distance is introduced to measure two evidences' conflict. The evidences are firstly modified according to the reliable coefficients calculated from the conflict, and fused by use of the D-S rule. The new conflict metric integrates the influence of both goal congruence and overall discrepancy. When the evidences have strong uncertainty and unreliability, it is more appropriate than that only using corLflict mass or distance. The method is applied in state monitoring of a micro-satellite' s power subsystem, approving that it could identify the system state and fault sensor more accurately than other methods.
出处 《宇航学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期1362-1369,共8页 Journal of Astronautics
基金 CAST创新基金(CAST20100604)
关键词 证据冲突 证据理论 冲突融合 证据距离 不可靠证据 Evidence conflict Evidence theory Conflict fusion Evidence distance Unreliable evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献64

共引文献90

同被引文献37

  • 1叶清,吴晓平,宋业新.基于权重系数与冲突概率重新分配的证据合成方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(7):1014-1016. 被引量:32
  • 2DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi valued mapping [ J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325 -339.
  • 3HAGHANI A, OH S-C. Formulation and solution of a multi-com- modity, multi-modal network flow model for disaster relief operations [ J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1996, 30(3) : 231 -250.
  • 4LEFEVRE E, ELOUEDI Z. How to preserve the conflict as an alarm in the combination of belief functions? [ J]. Decision Support Sys- tems, 2013, 56:326-333.
  • 5YANG Y, HAN D, HAN C. Discounted combination of unreliable evidence using degree of disagreement [ J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2013, 54(8): 1197-1216.
  • 6JOUSSELME A-L, GRENIER D, BOSSE E. A new distance be- tween two bodies of evidence [ J]. Information Fusion, 2001, 2(2): 91 -101.
  • 7LIU W. Analyzing the degree of contlict among belief functions [ J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 170(11) : 909 - 924.
  • 8SMETS P. Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pig- nistic transformation [ J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2005, 38(2): 133-147.
  • 9AYOUN A, SMETS P. Data association in multi-target detection u- sing the transferable belief model [ J]. International Journal of In- telligent Systems, 2001, 16(10) : 1167 - 1182.
  • 10SMARANDACHE F,MARTIN A,OSSWALD C. Contra-diction measures and specificity degrees of basic belief as-signments [C] / / Proceedings of the 14th InternationalConference on Information Fusion. Chicago, Illionois,USA:IEEE,2011,09:475-482.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部