期刊文献+

非那雄胺隔日给药治疗良性前列腺增生的效果观察 被引量:3

Effect observation of finasteride alternate-day dosing in benign prostatic hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察非那雄胺隔日给药治疗良性前列腺增生的临床效果。方法将100例良性前列腺增生患者随机分为观察组和对照组各50例。观察组给予非那雄胺5mg口服,每2天1次;对照组给予非那雄胺5mg口服,每天1次,比较2组临床疗效、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、最大尿流率、前列腺体积、生活质量评分(QOL)及不良反应。结果观察组有效率稍低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗6个月后,2组IPSS评分、最大尿流率、前列腺体积和QOL评分均优于治疗前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组稍高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论非那雄胺隔日给药治疗良性前列腺增生,效果较为满意,值得推广应用。 Objective To observe the effieaey of finasteride alternate-day dosing in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods 100 eases patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomly divided into observation group and control group ,each of 50 eases. Observation group was treated by finasteride ,Stag,oral ,once every two days. Control group was treated by finasteride,5mg, oral, once a day. Compared the elinieal efficacy, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum flow rate, prostate volume, quality of life (QOL) score and adverse reaction of two group. Results The effieieney of observa- tion group was higher than that of control group, but the difference was no statistically significant( P 〉 0.05 ). After 6 months of treatment, the IPSS, maximum flow rate, prostate volume, QOL of two groups were higher than that before treatment, the differ- enee was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). After 6 months of treatment, the IPSS, maximum flow rate, prostate volume, QOL of observation group was higher than that of control group, but the differenee was no statistically signifieant( P 〉 0.05 ). The inci- dence of adverse reactions of 2 groups was no statistically significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Finasteride alternate-day do- sing in benign prostatic hyperplasia has an good efficacy. Worthy of clinical application.
作者 张军
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2013年第28期19-20,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 非那雄胺 隔日给药 前列腺增生 良性 疗效 Finasteride Alternate-day dosing Prostatic hyperplasia, benign Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1陈业宗,崔强.易如特保列治治疗良性前列腺增生费用和疗效比较[J].现代医药卫生,2007,23(8):1151-1152. 被引量:2
  • 2敬思有,包军胜.保列治治疗良性前列腺增生3年疗效观察[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2007,9(4):18-18. 被引量:2
  • 3Brawer MK,Rennel MA,Nagle RB.Serum prostate-specific antigen and simple prostate pathology in men having simple prostatectomy[J].Am J Clin Pathol,1989,92(6):760-764.
  • 4张祥华,王行环,王刚,等.良性前列腺增生诊断治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:167-204.
  • 5Babaian RJ,Johnson DA,Naccarato W,et al.The incidence of prosrate cancer in a steering population with a serum prostate specific antiger between 2.5 and 4.0 ng/mL relation to biopsy strategy[J].J Urol,2001,165(3):757-760.
  • 6Thompson IM,Pauler DK,Goodman PJ,et al.Prvalence of prosrate cancer among men with a prostate-pecific antigen level≤4.0 ng per milliliter[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350:2239-2246.
  • 7McConnell J,Bruskewitz R,Walsh P,et al.The Effect of Finasteride on The Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and The Need For Surgical Treatment Among Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia[J].Nengl J Med,1988,338(9):557-563.
  • 8Chatelain C,Denis L,Foo KT,et al.Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee:Evaluation and Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms(LUTS)in Older Men[C].International Consultation on BPH,2011.
  • 9王学强,李宁,张衡.保列治治疗老年性前列腺增生症30例疗效观察[J].山东医药,2008,48(35):96-96. 被引量:6
  • 10张春和,李焱风,陈天波,张富刚.前列通窍颗粒联合保列治治疗良性前列腺增生65例疗效观察[J].世界中西医结合杂志,2009,4(11):797-798. 被引量:10

共引文献8

同被引文献22

  • 1伊敏,海玲,杜林娥.蒙药结合艾灸治疗前列腺增生症[J].中国民间疗法,2005,13(12):30-31. 被引量:2
  • 2魏强,李涛.良性前列腺增生的药物治疗[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(7):557-559. 被引量:20
  • 3Chapple CR. Alpha -adrenergic blocking drugs in bladder outflow obstruction: what potential has alpha 1 -adrenoceptor selectivity[J]. Br J Urol, 1995, 76 (Suppl 1) : 47-55.
  • 4Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Bergner D, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume predict lone-term changes in symptoms and flow rate: results of a four years, randomised trial comparing finasteride versus placebo. PLESS Study Group [J J.Urology, 1999,54(4) : 662.
  • 5Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate Cancer[J ]. N EnglJ Med,2003,349(3) : 215.
  • 6Bruskewitz R, Girman C J, Fowler J, et al. Effect of finasteride on bother and other heahh-related quality of ife aspects associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. PLSEE Study Group. Proscar Long-term Efficacy andSafety Study[J]. Urology, 1999,54(4) : 670.
  • 7McconneU JD, Roehrbom C G, Bautista OM,et al. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].N Engl JMed,2003,349(25):2387-2398.
  • 8Kaplan S A.Mccormell J D, Roehrbom C G, et al. Medical therapy of prostatic symptoms (MTOPS) research group, combination therapy with doxazosin and finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patientswith lowerurinary tract symptoms and a baseline total prostate volume of 25 mL or greater[J].J Urol, 2006, 175 ( 1 ):217-220.
  • 9Connolly S S, Fitzpatrick JM.Medical treatmentof benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].PostgradMed J, 2007,83(976): 73-78.
  • 10Hutehison A, Farmer R, Verhamme K, et al. The efficacy of drugs for the treatment of LUTS / BPH, a study in 6 European eountries[J].Eur Urol, 2007,51 ( 1 ) : 207.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部