期刊文献+

酸化环境对冬小麦幼苗生长及生理特性的影响 被引量:1

Effects of Soil Acidification on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Winter Wheat Seedlings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以冬小麦(TriticumaestivumL.)品种西农979和丰抗88为对象,研究冬小麦幼苗在不同酸化环境下的生长及生理指标的变化。酸化环境设pH为4.0、5.0、6.0、6.9四个处理.结果显示,随着环境酸化程度加强,冬小麦幼苗地上和根系生物量均呈先增后降的变换趋势,在pH5.0~6.0时较高,pH低于5.0冬小麦幼苗生物量下降.西农979和丰抗88的根长、表面积和根尖数分别在pH小于6.0和5.0下降,二者根系活力在pH小于5.0下降.冬小麦叶绿素a/b随土壤酸性加强先降后升,pH5.0时最低.以上结果表明,冬小麦较适合pH5.0~6.0的弱酸性环境,pH低于5.0时生长受限. In the paper, winter wheat varieties Xinong979 and Fenkang88 were chosen as objects of study, and the changes of growth and physiological index on winter wheat seedlings were studied in different acid environments. There are four treatments in the experiment, and pH value is 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 6.9 in four acid soil environments, respectively. The results showed that biomasses of aboveground and root system on winter wheat seedlings first increased and then decreased. The biomasses were high when pH value was from 5.0 to 6.0; while when pH value was below 5.0, the biomasses were dropped. The root length, surface area and the root tip numbers of Xinong979 and Fenkang88 decreased when pH value was below 6.0 and 5.0 ; and the energy of root system also decreased when pH value was below 5.0. The chlorophyll a/b of winter wheat first dropped and then increased, it was the lowest when pH value was 5.0. Winter wheat had a good growth in weak acid (pHS. 0~6.0) soil environments and its growth was restricted when pH value was below 5.0.
出处 《河南大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第5期549-552,共4页 Journal of Henan University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31070394) 河南省基础与前沿研究项目(092300410095)
关键词 冬小麦 生长 生理特性 土壤酸化 winter wheat growth physiological characteristics soil acidification
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Goulding K W T, Vitousek P M, Zhang F S. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J].Science, 2010, 327: 1008 1010.
  • 2汪吉东,戚冰洁,张永春,张爱君,宁运旺,许仙菊,张辉,马洪波.长期施肥对砂壤质石灰性潮土土壤酸碱缓冲体系的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(4):1031-1036. 被引量:35
  • 3张喜林,周宝库,孙磊,高中超.长期施用化肥和有机肥料对黑土酸度的影响[J].土壤通报,2008,39(5):1221-1223. 被引量:45
  • 4Yang Y H, Ji C, Ma W H, et al. Significant soil acidification across northern China's grasslands during 1980s 2000s[J]. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 2292-2300.
  • 5Li L, Rengel Z. Soil acidification as affected by phosphorus sources and interspecific root interactions between wheat and chickpea [J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2012, 43:1749 1756.
  • 6Stroia C, More C, Jouany C. Nitrogen fertilization effects on frassland soil acidification: consequences on diffusive phos- phorus ions[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75: 112-120.
  • 7Wang Y, Zhang F S, Marschner P. Soil pH is the main factor influencing growth and rhizosphere properties of wheat fol lowing different pre-crops[J]. Plant Soil, 2012, DOI: 10.1007/s11104 012 1236 1.
  • 8Carver B F, Ownby J D. Acid soil tolerance in wheat [J]. Advances in Agronomy, 1995, 54:117 173.
  • 9Lambers H, Chapin F S, Pons T L, et al. Plant Physiological Ecology[M]. Zhejiang University Press, 2005.
  • 10Schroder J, Zhang H, Girman K, et al. Soil acidification from long-term use ot nitrogen tertlhzers on winter wi:eat[J] Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011,75:957 964.

二级参考文献16

共引文献76

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部