期刊文献+

两种皮肤消毒剂对外科手术部位感染预防作用的荟萃分析 被引量:7

Meta-analysis of effects of two skin disinfectants on prevention of surgical site infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较术前氯己定和聚维酮碘皮肤消毒对外科手术部位感染发生率的影响,为有效选择消毒剂,减少手术部位感染发生率提供依据。方法对2012年3月前发表的关于氯己定与聚维酮碘消毒对外科手术部位感染发生率影响的文献进行荟萃分析,结果选取相对危险度(RR值)及其95%CI表示。结果共纳入8篇文献5633例患者,荟萃分析结果显示,聚维酮碘组外科手术部位感染发生率为9.29%,氯己定组为6.95%,氯己定消毒可降低外科手术部位感染的发生(RR=0.75,95%CI=0.63~0.89)。结论术前氯己定消毒比聚维酮碘消毒能更好预防外科手术部位感染发生。 OBJECTIVE To compare influence of skin disinfection with chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine on the incidence of surgical site infections so as to choose effective disinfectant and reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. METHODS A meta-analysis was performed for the articles about the influence of disinfection with chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine on the incidence of surgical site infections issued before Mar 2012, and the results were interpreted by using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS A total of 8 articles were included in the study, with 5633 patients involved, the meta-analysis showed that the incidence rate of surgical site infections was 9.29 ~ in the povidone-iodine group, 6.95 ~ in the chlorhexidine group, and that the disinfection with chlorhexidine could reduce the incidence of surgical site infections (RR= O. 75, 95 MCI= O. 63 -0.89). CONCLUSION The preoperative skin disinfection with chlorhexidine is superior to povidone-iodine in the prevention of surgical site infections.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第19期4749-4750,4753,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 河南省教育厅重点学科建设基金(豫教高[2012]186)
关键词 氯己定 聚维酮碘 手术部位感染 Chlorhexidine Povidone-iodinel Surgical site infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1王丽娜,冯红燕,马贵芳.手术患者医院感染的危险因素[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2012,22(8):1598-1599. 被引量:4
  • 2Lee I, Agarwal RK, Lee BY, et al. Systematic review and cost analysis comparing use of chlorhexidine with use of iodine for preoperative skin antisepsis to prevent surgical site inection [J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010, 31 (12) : 1219- 1229.
  • 3Cheng K, Robertson H, St Mart JP, et al. Quanlitative analy- sis of bacteria in forefoot surgery:a comparison of skin prepa- ration techniques[J]. Foot Ankle Int,2009,30(10) :992-997.
  • 4Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM, et al. Chlorhexidine-al- cohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,362(1) ,18-26.
  • 5Sistla SC,Prabhu G, Sistla S,et al. Minimizing wound con- tamination in a "clean" surgery: comparison of chlorhexidine- ethanol and povidone-iodine[J]. Chemotherapy, 2010,56 (4) :261-267.
  • 6Paocharoen V,Mingmalairak C,Apisarnthanarak A. Compar- ison of surgical wound infection after preoperative skin prepa- ration with 4 chlorhexidine and povidone iodine a prospec- tive randomized trial[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2009,92 (7) : 898-902.
  • 7Swenson BR, Hedrick TL, Metzger R,et al. Effects of preop erative skin preparation on postoperative wound infection rates:a prospective study of 3 skin preparation protocols[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2009,30(10) : 964-971.
  • 8Brown TR, Ehrlich CE, Stehman FB, et al. A clinical evalua- tion of chlorhexidine gluconate spray as compared with io- dophor scrub for preoperative skin preparation[J]. Surg Gy- necol Obstet, 1984,158(4) : 363-366.
  • 9Veiga DF, Damasceno CA, Veiga-Filho J, et al. Povidone io- dine versus chlorhexidine in skin antisepsis before elective plastic surgery proceduresa randomized controlled trial[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2008,122(5) :170-171.
  • 10Berry AR, Watt B,Goldacre MJ, et al. A comparison of the use of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine in the prophylaxis of postoperative wound infection[J]. J Hosp Infect, 1982,3 (1) : 55-63.

二级参考文献7

共引文献3

同被引文献151

引证文献7

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部