高校工程实训课程效能评估体系的实证研究被引量：12

An Empirical Study on the Performance Evaluation System of Engineering Training Course in Universities

导出

摘要实训课程效能评价指标包括两大部分:一部分是"产出"指标,即学生在实训课程学习的发展水平指标;另一部分是"投入"评价指标,即对课程实施产生影响的因素指标。本研究根据调查统计数据,运用单一样本T检验和因子分析,构建了高校工程实训课程效能评价指标体系。学生能力发展评价指标体系包含能力习得、能力操作、能力物化三个维度共14项指标。课程影响因素指标体系包含课程性因素和学生因素两个维度,共16项指标。 Performance Evaluation of training course include the ＂output＂ index, which is students＇ learning levels in the training course, and the ＂input＂ index, namely the factors affecting the curriculum imple- mentation. According to the survey data and the test and analysis of single sample T, the paper con- structs a performance evaluation system for universities＇ engineering training course. The evaluation system of students＇ capability development includes 14 indexes from the three dimensions of capability acquisition, capability operation and capability materialization. The index system of factors affecting the curriculum includes 16 indexes from the two dimensions of curriculum and students.

作者葛斌李玉光吴志华

机构地区大连大学工程训练中心大连大学辽宁师范大学课程研究中心

出处《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期150-154,共5页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering

基金教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"高校工程实训课程效能评价研究与实践"(项目编号:10YJA880033) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"高等职业教育实践课程效能评价的研究与实践"(项目编号:09YJA880062)的研究成果之一

关键词高等学校实训课程效能评价指标

分类号 G642.4 [文化科学—高等教育学] F280-4 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1Slavin, Robert E. and Cynthia Lake.《Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best- Evidence Synthesis》, 《 Review of Educational Research》, 2008 (3).
2弗兰西斯科.索夫,杨燕燕.课程效能评价——以“教育效能与教育评价”为例[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(5):57-60. 被引量：19
3吴志华,傅维利.实践能力含义及辨析[J].上海教育科研,2006(9):23-25. 被引量：83
4李晓文.《学生自我发展之心理学探究》,教育科学出版社2006版,第19-108页.
5Laukenmann. M. , Bleicher. M. , Fuss. S - von Rhoneck. C. 《 An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction》,《International Journal of Sci- ence Education》, 2003 (4).

二级参考文献15

1刘磊,傅维利.实践能力:含义、结构及培养对策[J].教育科学,2005,21(2):1-5. 被引量：282
2Sofo,Francesco. Educational Effectiveness and Evaluation[M]. Canberra: University of Canberra subject guide,study guide and lectures,2004. 23-77.
3Brinkerhoff, O. Robert and Apking,Anne M. High Impact Learning: strategies for leveraging business results from trainning [M ]. Cambridge,M A: Perseus Publishing,2001. 209-232.
4Sofo, Fmncesco.Human Resource Development:perspectives,roles and practice choices[M]. Sydney:Business and Professional Publishing, 1999. 196.
5Carlopio,James. Implementation: Making workplace innovation and technical change happen[M]. Sydney: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 1998. 1-19.
6Eisner,Elliot, W.. The educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs [M]. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company,1985. 45-48.
7Scfiven,M.Goal Free Evaluation[A]. E.R.. House (ed.)School Evaluation: the politics and the process [C].Berkeley,C A: McCutchan.,1972. 94-97.
8Popham,W. James. Educational Evaluation[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1988. 21-51.
9Scriven,M.. The logic of evaluation[M]. Port R.eyes,CA: Edge Press,1980. 33-37.
10Scriven,M.. Evaluation Thesaurus [J]. 4th. Edition.Newbury Park,CA: Sage,1991. 26-28.