多维邻近性对跨区域技术创新合作的影响——基于中国共同专利数据的实证分析被引量：132

Impact of multidimensional proximities on cross region technology innovation cooperation: experical analysis based on Chinese coinvent patent data

原文传递

导出

摘要区域间的邻近性是影响跨区域技术创新合作的重要因素。本文界定了区域间的认知邻近性、制度邻近性、地理邻近性,提出了多维邻近性对跨区域技术创新合作关系的概念模型,基于1999-2009年中国30个区域间的共同申请专利数据进行了实证研究。结果表明认知邻近性、制度邻近性、地理邻近性是跨区域技术创新合作的显著影响因素。其中国区域间认知邻近性过高,制约了跨区域技术创新合作的发展;区域间制度邻近性对跨区域技术创新合作有促进作用,而地方保护主义对中国跨区域技术创新合作的影响已不显著;地理邻近性仍然是跨区域技术创新合作的重要促进因素;区域创新能力相似性对多维邻近性与跨区域技术创新合作的关系有正向调节作用。 The proximities among regions have great impact on the cross region technology innovation cooperation （CRTIC）. This article defined the cognitive proximity, institutional proximity and geographic proximity between regions, put forward the concept model of the relation between different dimension proximity and CRTIC ,based on chinese 30 regional 1999 -2009 coinvent patent data for empirical research. Results indicated that the cognitive proximity and institutional proximity and geography proximity are important factors for CRTIC. The excessive cognitive proximity between regions had constrainted CRTIC in China. Institutional proximity had promoting the CRTIC, and the effect of local protectionism on China CRT1C does not significant. Geographic proximity still is important promoting factor for CRTIC. The similarity of regional innovative ability positively moderated the relationship between multi - dimensional proximity and CRTIC.

作者党兴华弓志刚

机构地区西安理工大学经济与管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期1590-1600,共11页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家软科学研究计划项目(2007GXQ4D188) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972051)

关键词邻近性技术创新跨区域合作共同专利 proximity technology innovation cross region cooperation coinvent patent

分类号 F061.5 [经济管理—政治经济学] C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献39

1Zhu Ling, Chen Jin, Searching for China' s regional in- novation poles and holes: based on the scientometrics of regional patent collaboration data [C ]. Fourth Interna- tional Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics, and Scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting, 28 July - 1 August 2008.
2Berlin. Torre A, Gilly J P. On the analytical dimension of prox- imity dynamics [ J ]. Regional Studies, 2000, 34 ( 2 ) : 169 - 180.
3Boschma R A. Proximity and innovation: a critical assess- ment [ J ]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39 ( 1 ) : 61 - 74.
4Noote Boom. Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies [ M ]. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
5Alain Railer, Andr: Torre. Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of the global economy? [ J]. Geography Journal , 1999, 49 : 373 - 380.
6Thierry Kirat. Innovation and proximity: territories asloci of collective learning processes [ J ]. European Ur- ban and Regional Studies, 1999, 6(1): 27-38.
7Matt Bradshaw. Multiple proximities: culture and geogra- phy in the transport logistics of newsprint manufactured in Australia[ J]. Environment and Planning A, 2001, 33:1717 - 1739.
8Marja Hyypi: , Mika Kautonen. Dimensions of proximi- ty in relationships between knowledge intensive business service firms and their clients [ C ].Regional Studies Association International Conference on Regional Growth Agendas 28th 31st May 2005, Aalborg Denmark.
9Schamp E W, Rentmeister B, Vivien L O. Dimensions of proximity in knowledge - based networks : the cases of investment banking and automobile design[ J]. Europe- an Planning Studies, 2004,12 ( 5 ) : 607 - 624.
10Coenen L, Moodysson J, Asheim B T. Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the Med- icon Valley biotech cluster [ J ]. European Planning Studies,2004, 12 : 1003 - 1018.