期刊文献+

高频振荡通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效对比研究 被引量:6

Efficacy contrast of high frequency oscillatory ventilation in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价高频振荡通气在治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效。方法将NRDS患儿106例随机分为高频振荡通气组(HFOV组)和常频机械通气组(CMV组),比较两组治疗效果、通气后6 h和24 h患儿血气分析结果以及住院时间等指标。结果 HFOV组治愈率显著高于CMV组(P<0.05);且HFOV组患儿在通气后6 h和12 h,PaO2高于CMV组,OI、PaCO2低于CMV组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);HFOV组患儿住院时间显著少于CMV组(P<0.01)。结论高频振荡通气较常频机械通气更能有效改善呼吸窘迫综合征患儿肺功能情况,提高治愈率,减少患儿住院时间,值得推广应用。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of !figh frequency oscillatory ventilation in treatment of neonatal respira- tory distress syndrome. Methods Totally 106 infant patients with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome(NRDS) were randomly assigned into high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) group and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) group. The indexes including therapeutic effect, blood gas analysis results of 6h and 24h alter treatment and hospitalization time of each group were compared. Results Cure rate of HFOV group were significantly higher than CMV group. 6h and 24h after treatment,PaO2 of HFOV group were higher than CMV group while OI and PaCO2 were significantly lower than CMV group. The hospitalization time of HFOV group was shorter. Conclusion Compared to conventional mechanical ventilation, high frequency oscillatoE~ ventilation can improve the pulmonary function of the in- fants more effectively. With higher cure rate and shorter hospitalization time, HFOV is feasible to generalize in clinical application.
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2013年第10期52-53,共2页 Journal of Medical Forum
关键词 新生儿 呼吸窘迫综合征 高频振荡通气 Nowborn Respiratory distress syndrome High frequency oscillatory ventilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1黄绮薇,张宇鸣,张国琴,滕国良,裘刚.高频通气治疗重症新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征[J].中华儿科杂志,2001,39(1):7-10. 被引量:10
  • 2戎群芳,黄绮薇,汤定华,张宇鸣.高频通气治疗新生儿重症呼吸衰竭[J].小儿急救医学,2004,11(4):228-230. 被引量:19
  • 3常立文,李文斌.新生儿急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(2):84-86. 被引量:35
  • 4Courtney SE, Durand D J, Asselin JM, et al. High - frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very - low - birth - weight infants [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2002,347 ( 9 ) :643 - 652.
  • 5Bollen CW, Uiterwaal CS, van Vught AJ. Meta -regression analysis of high -frequency ventilation vs conventional ventilation in infant respiratory distresssyndrome [ J ]. Intensive Care Med, 2007,33 ( 4 ) : 680 - 688.
  • 6Colaizy TT, Younis UM, Bell EF, et al. Nasal high- frequency ventilation for premature infants [ J ]. Acta Paediatr, 2008,97 ( 11 ) : 1518 - 1522.
  • 7Moriette G, Paris - Llado J, Walti H, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of high - frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation in preterm infants of less than 30 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome [ J ]. Pediatrics, 2001,107 ( 2 ) : 363 - 372.
  • 8Henderson -Smart D J, Cools F, Bhuta T,et al. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2007 (3) : CD000104.
  • 9宋志芳.现代呼吸机治疗学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2002.78.
  • 10朱建幸.新生儿机械通气临床应用特点[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(18):1362-1364. 被引量:18

共引文献85

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部