期刊文献+

基于ET-DFT分层模型的复杂系统动态概率安全评价方法研究 被引量:4

A Complex System Dynamic Probabilistic Safety Assessment Method Based on ET-DFT Hierarchical Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为充分体现复杂系统的动态行为对其可靠性的影响,减少系统动态故障概率计算时的工作量,应用层次化分析思想,综合事件树(ET)和动态故障树(DFT),提出基于ET-DFT模型的动态概率安全评价(DPSA)方法。应用二元决策图(BDD)和马尔科夫链(MC)分别对静态故障树和DFT进行求解,给出将静态故障树和DFT向BDD及马尔科夫链转移图的转化算法,以及系统各状态概率的求解方法。通过应用实例的分析验证,得到系统静态模块定量的发生概率及动态模块各个状态概率随时间变化的曲线,经综合求解得到系统故障发生的概率,实现对系统较为精确的DPSA。 In order to fully consider the influence of complex systems'dynamic behavior on their reliability, and to reduce the system dynamic failure probability calculation workload, a DPSA method based on ET-DFT model was worked out by integrating ET and DFT, where the hierarchical analysis method was used. The BDD and MC were used to solve the static fault tree and DFF. The transformation algorithms between static fault tree and BDD, and between DFT and MC transform diagram were presented. A solu- tion method of each state probability of the system was also given. A certain application example was used to illustrate the proposed method. It shows that the quantitative occurrence probability of system static module and the probability of each state change over time of system dynamic module can be obtained, and the system fault probability can be obtained through comprehensive solution. The accurate dynamic probabilistic safety assessment of the system can be realized.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第8期78-83,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(61164009) 江西省自然科学基金资助(20132BAB206026) 江西省科技支撑计划-工业支撑计划项目(2010BGB01200)
关键词 动态故障树(DFT) 事件树(ET) 二元决策图(BDD) 马尔科夫链(MC) 动态概率安全评价(DPSA) dynamic fault tree(DFT) event tree(ET) binary decision diagram(BDD) Markov chain(MC) dynamic probabilistic safety assessment(DPSA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Cojazzi G. The DYLAM approach for the dynamic reliability analysis of systems[ J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996, 52(3): 279-296.
  • 2戴立操,张力,鹏程.PSA中人因失误模型化研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(3):76-80. 被引量:4
  • 3陈文瑛,吴穹,王勇毅.机械安全性评估方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2010,20(1):77-83. 被引量:17
  • 4Marko C, Borut M. A dynamic fault tree[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 75 (1) : 83 -91.
  • 5Aldemir T. A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants[J].Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2013, 52:113 - 124.
  • 6Aldemir D W, Miller M P, Stovsky J, et al. Current State of Reliability Modeling Methodologies for Digital Systems and Their Acceptance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Assessments (NURE-G/CR-6901)[R]. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2006.
  • 7陶俊勇,王勇,陈循.复杂大系统动态可靠性与动态概率风险评估技术发展现状[J].兵工学报,2009,30(11):1533-1539. 被引量:8
  • 8Chiacchio F, Cacioppo M, D'Urso D, et al. A weibull-based compositional approach for hierarchical dynamic fault trees[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013,109:45 -52.
  • 9Rao K D, Gopika V, Rao V V, et al. Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94(4): 872 -883.
  • 10Dugan J B, Bavuso S J, Boyd M A. Dynamic fault-tree models for fault-tolerant computer systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1992, 41(3) : 363 - 377.

二级参考文献67

共引文献82

同被引文献61

  • 1徐浩军,葛志浩,孟捷.应用时间裕度法评估人-机系统飞行安全[J].飞行力学,2007,25(2):89-92. 被引量:5
  • 2周忠宝,周经伦,孙权,金光,董豆豆.基于离散时间贝叶斯网络的动态故障树分析方法[J].西安交通大学学报,2007,41(6):732-736. 被引量:23
  • 3徐邦年.飞行安全评估概论[M].北京:蓝天出版社.2005.
  • 4余贻鑫,王东涛,王成山,贾宏杰,吴建中,魏伟,曾沅,王守相,王菲,付川,冯兆飞,张晶玉,汪映辉.基于安全域的输电系统概率安全评估系统框架[J].天津大学学报,2007,40(6):699-703. 被引量:8
  • 5Giacomo Cojazzi. The DYLAM approach for the dynamic reliability analysis of systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996, 52(3) : 279 -296.
  • 6Tunc Aldemir. A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2013, 52(2) : 113 - 124.
  • 7Martin Neil, Manesh Tailor, David Marquez, et al. Modelling dependable systems using hybrid Bayesian networks[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93(7): 933 -939.
  • 8Alyson G Wilson, Aparna V Huzurbazar. Bayesian networks for multilevel system reliability[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2007, 92(10): 1 413 -1 420.
  • 9Katrina Groth, Wang Cheng-dong, Ali Mosleh. Hybrid causal methodology and software platform for probabilistic risk as- sessment and safety monitoring of socio-technical systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010, 95(12) : 1 276-1285.
  • 10Nima Khakzad, Faisal Khan, Paul Amyotte. Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 109:5 -17.

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部