期刊文献+

Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass wastes and waste activated sludge: Dynamic model and material balances 被引量:2

Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass wastes and waste activated sludge: Dynamic model and material balances
原文传递
导出
摘要 The organic matter degradation process during anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste (MBW) and waste-activated sludge (WAS) under different organic loading rates (OLRs) was investigated in bench-scale and pilot-scale semi-continuous stirred tank reactors. To better understand the degradation process of MBW and WAS co-digestion and provide theoretical guidance for engineering application, anaerobic digestion model No. 1 was revised for the co-digestion of MBW and WAS. The results showed that the degradation of organic matter could be characterized into three different fractions, including readily hydrolyzable organics, easily degradable particulate organics, and recalcitrant particle organics. Hydrolysis was the rate-limiting step under lower OLRs, and methanogenesisis was the rate-limiting step for an OLR of 8.0 kg volatile solid (VS)/(m^3·day). The hydrolytic parameters of carbohydrate, protein, and lipids were 0.104, 0.083, and 0.084 kg chemical oxygen demand (COD)/(kg COD·hr), respectively, and the reaction rate parameters of lipid fermentation were 1 and 1.25 kg COD/(kg COD.hr) for OLRs of 4.0 and 6.0 kg VS/(m^3·day). A revised model was used to simulate methane yield, and the results fit well with the experimental data. Material balance data were acquired based on the revised model, which showed that 58.50% of total COD was converted to methane. The organic matter degradation process during anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste (MBW) and waste-activated sludge (WAS) under different organic loading rates (OLRs) was investigated in bench-scale and pilot-scale semi-continuous stirred tank reactors. To better understand the degradation process of MBW and WAS co-digestion and provide theoretical guidance for engineering application, anaerobic digestion model No. 1 was revised for the co-digestion of MBW and WAS. The results showed that the degradation of organic matter could be characterized into three different fractions, including readily hydrolyzable organics, easily degradable particulate organics, and recalcitrant particle organics. Hydrolysis was the rate-limiting step under lower OLRs, and methanogenesisis was the rate-limiting step for an OLR of 8.0 kg volatile solid (VS)/(m^3·day). The hydrolytic parameters of carbohydrate, protein, and lipids were 0.104, 0.083, and 0.084 kg chemical oxygen demand (COD)/(kg COD·hr), respectively, and the reaction rate parameters of lipid fermentation were 1 and 1.25 kg COD/(kg COD.hr) for OLRs of 4.0 and 6.0 kg VS/(m^3·day). A revised model was used to simulate methane yield, and the results fit well with the experimental data. Material balance data were acquired based on the revised model, which showed that 58.50% of total COD was converted to methane.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2013年第10期2112-2122,共11页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No.2010DFA22770) the National Science and Technology Support Program of China (No.2010BAC66B04) the Key Laboratory for Advanced Technology in Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province (No.AE201003)
关键词 anaerobic digestion material balances kinetic parameters MODELLING municipal biomass waste anaerobic digestion material balances kinetic parameters modelling municipal biomass waste
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献63

  • 1王治军,王伟.热水解预处理改善污泥的厌氧消化性能[J].环境科学,2005,26(1):68-71. 被引量:105
  • 2Barker D J, Stuckey D C, 1999. A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Research, 33(14): 3063-3082.
  • 3Bilgili M S, Demir A, Akkaya E, Ozkaya B, 2008. COD fractions of leachate from aerobic and anaerobic pilot scale landfill reactors. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 158(1): 157-163.
  • 4Boero V J, Bowers A R, Eckenfelder W W, 1996. Molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products in biological systems. Water Science and Technology, 34(5-6): 241-248.
  • 5Calli B, Mertoglu B, Inanc B, 2005. Landfill leachate management in Istanbul: Applications and alternatives. Chemosphere, 59(6): 819-829.
  • 6Castillo E, Vergara M, Moreno Y, 2007. Landfill leachate treatment using a rotating biological contactor and an upward-flow anaerobic sludge bed reactor. Waste Management, 27(5): 720-726.
  • 7Cheng H, Zhang Y, Meng A, Li Q, 2007. Municipal solid waste fueled power generation in China: a case study of wasteto-energy in Changchun City. Environmental Science and Technology, 41(21): 7509-7515.
  • 8Diamantis V I, Aivasidis A, 2007. Comparison of single- and two-stage UASB reactors used for anaerobic treatment of synthetic fruit wastewater. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 42(1): 6-10.
  • 9Dignac M F, Ginestet P, Rybacki D, Bruchet A, Urbain V, Scribe P, 2000. Fate of wastewater organic pollution during activated sludge treatment: nature of residual organic matter. Water Research, 34(17): 4185-4194.
  • 10Enzminger J D, Robertson D, Ahlert R C, Kosson D S, 1987. Treatment of landfill leachates. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 14(1): 83-101.

共引文献70

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部