期刊文献+

股权分置改革对审计质量的持续影响

The Continuous Impact of Non-Tradable Share Reform on Auditing Quality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本论文从"股权分置改革是要消除非流通股与流通股之间流动性差异"目标出发,研究了2005年至2011股改不同阶段对审计质量的影响。研究表明:审计质量在股改不同阶段呈显著性波动,其中在股改方案推进阶段审计质量整体不高,并未发生实质性变化;在股改方案通过以后、限售股东大尚未大规模减持公司股份阶段,公司审计质量显著提高;而进入持有限售股份股东大规模减持阶段,则审计质量显著下降。 Affording to CSRC.the objective of Non—Tradable Share Reform is to eliminate the difference between the tradable shares and non—tradable shares.Because of the objective,this article studied the continuous effects ot different stages of Non—Tradable Share Reform on auditing quality during 2005 to 201 1.This study shows that,the audit quality significantly fluctuated with the stage of Non-Tradahle Share Reform.On the reform project pushing-on stage,the audit quality presents a low-level and non—material change as a whole;but after the reform projects have been approved,and the selling of restricted share have not been triggered,the audit quality gel a dramatically improvement;then the audit quality declines sharply,coming with the stage of large-scale selling of restricted shares.
作者 何才元 张刚
出处 《财会通讯(下)》 2013年第9期19-23,129,共5页 Communication of Finance and Accounting
关键词 股权分置改革 审计质量 盈余管理 审计行为 Non-Tradable share reform Audit quality Earnings management Audit behavior.
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

  • 1李远鹏,李若山.是会计盈余稳健性,还是利润操纵?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国会计与财务研究,2005,7(3):1-56. 被引量:91
  • 2Basu, S. 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 3-37.
  • 3Ball, R. , A. Robin, and J. S. Wu. 2000. Accounting Standards, the Institutional Environment and Issuer Incentives: Effect on Timely Loss Recognition in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 7(1): 71-96.
  • 4Ball, R. , A. Robin and J. S. Wu. 2003. Incentive versus Standards: Properties of Accounting Income in Four East Asian Countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (1 -3): 235 -270.
  • 5Garcia Lara, Garcia Osma and Mora. 2005. The Effect of Earnings Management on the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting32 (3-4): 691 -726.
  • 6Watts. 2003. Conservatism in Accounting Part Ⅰ: Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons 17 (3) : 207 -221.
  • 7Watts. 2003. Conservatism in Accounting Part Ⅱ: Evidence and Research Opportunities. Accounting Horizons 17 (4): 287-301.
  • 8李增泉,卢文彬.会计盈余的稳健性:发现与启示[J].会计研究,2003(2):19-27. 被引量:238
  • 9刘峰,吴风,钟瑞庆.会计准则能提高会计信息质量吗——来自中国股市的初步证据[J].会计研究,2004(5):8-19. 被引量:168

共引文献197

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部