期刊文献+

三种树脂粘接剂对氧化锆陶瓷粘接剪切强度的影响 被引量:7

Effect of Three Resin Luting Cements for Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨牙科氧化锆陶瓷粘接材料的强度。方法将氧化锆陶瓷样本分为3组,每组20片,采用PanaviaTMF树脂粘接剂,RelyXTMARC树脂粘接剂,Multilink Sprint树脂粘接剂分别与氧化锆陶瓷样本粘接,通过水浴24 h和水浴30 d的方法,测试其粘接剪切强度。结果 PanaviaTMF树脂粘接材料粘接强度最好,分别为(33.36±3.69)MPa(水浴24 h)、(32.52±3.24)MPa(水浴30 d)。Multilink Sprint树脂粘接材料粘接强度为(26.65±2.51)MPa(水浴24 h),水浴30 d后明显变化为(18.42±2.28)MPa,P<0.05。RelyXTMARC的粘接强度为(16.39±1.85)MPa(水浴24 h),水浴30 d后粘接强度为(12.06±1.58)MPa,P<0.05。结论试验表明含有磷酸酯单体的树脂粘接材料可加强氧化锆陶瓷冠的粘接效果。 Objective To study the shear bond strength of dental zirconia ceramics. Methods Zirconia ceramics were randomly divided into 3 groups with 20 slices in each group. They were bonded with 3 kinds of luting cements respectively. After preservation in 37 distilled-water for 24 hours and 30 days, the shear bonding strength of these specimens was tested and bond section were observed by scanning electron microscope. Results The shear bonding strength in the group of Panavia ^TM was (33.36 ± 3.69) MPa after 24 hours, (32.52 ± 3.24) MPa after 30 days, significantly different from that in group of RelyX^TMARC and group of Multilink Sprint (P 〈0.05). The shear bonding strength in other groups of RelyX MARC and Multilink Sprint was (16.39 ± 1.85) MPa and (26.65 ± 2.51) MPa (after 24 hours), (12.06 ± 1.58) MPa and (18.42 ± 2.28) MPa after 30 days respectively (P 〈0.05). Conclusions Resin luting cement containing phosphate monomer (MDP) can provide zirconia ceramics a strong and long-lasting bonding.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2013年第10期1218-1219,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2012B031800060)
关键词 树脂粘接剂 氧化锆陶瓷 剪切强度 Resin luting cement Zirconia ceramics Shear bond strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1张玮,姚畅旺,韩栋伟.表面处理对Cercon氧化锆陶瓷黏结强度的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2007,23(2):272-275. 被引量:23
  • 2Szep S, Schmid C, Weigl P, et al. Effect of the silicone disclosing procedure on the shear bond strength of composite cements to ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 2003, 89 ( 1 ) : 60 - 65.
  • 3姜婷,二阶堂澈,等.实用口腔粘结修复技术.北京:人民军医出版社,2008,35-44.
  • 4HOOShmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin - bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater, 2002, 18(2) : 179 -188.
  • 5Kumbuloglu O, User A, Toksavul S, et al. Intra - oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: A comparison. Acta Odontol scand, 2003, 61(51): 268-272.
  • 6陈治清 管利民.口腔粘结学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1992.66-73.
  • 7van Dijken JW.Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and selfcured resin composite luted ceramic inlays.A 5-year clinical evaluation[J].Dent Mater,2003,19(7):670-674.
  • 8Ozcana M,Vallitt PK.Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics[J].Dent Mater,2003,19:725-731.
  • 9陈治清.口腔粘结学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1992:17-18.
  • 10Kern M,Wegner SM.Bonding to zirconia ceramic:adhesion methods and their durability[J].Dent Mater,1998,14:64-71.

共引文献28

同被引文献82

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部