期刊文献+

Evaluation of reanalysis and satellite-based sea surface winds using in situ measurements from Chinese Antarctic Expeditions 被引量:2

Evaluation of reanalysis and satellite-based sea surface winds using in situ measurements from Chinese Antarctic Expeditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Sea surface winds from reanalysis (NCEP-2 and ERA-40 datasets) and satellite-based products (QuikSCAT and NCDC blended sea winds) are evaluated using in situ ship measurements from the Chinese National Antarctic Research Expeditions (CH1NAREs) from 1989 through 2006, with emphasis on the Southern Ocean (south of 45°S). Compared with ship observations, the reanalysis winds have a positive mean bias (0.32 m·s-1 for NCEP-2 and 0.13 m·s-1 for ERA-40), and this bias is more pronounced in the Southern Ocean (0.57 m·s-1 and 0.45 m·s-1, respectively). However, mean biases are negative in the tropics and subtropics. The satellite-based winds also show positive mean biases, larger than those of the reanalysis data. All four wind products overestimate ship wind speed for weak winds (〈4 m·s-1) but underestimate for strong winds (〉10 m·s-1). Differences between the reanalysis and satellite winds are examined to identify regions with large discrepancies. Sea surface winds from reanalysis (NCEP-2 and ERA-40 datasets) and satellite-based products (QuikSCAT and NCDC blended sea winds) are evaluated using in situ ship measurements from the Chinese National Antarctic Research Expeditions (CH1NAREs) from 1989 through 2006, with emphasis on the Southern Ocean (south of 45°S). Compared with ship observations, the reanalysis winds have a positive mean bias (0.32 m·s-1 for NCEP-2 and 0.13 m·s-1 for ERA-40), and this bias is more pronounced in the Southern Ocean (0.57 m·s-1 and 0.45 m·s-1, respectively). However, mean biases are negative in the tropics and subtropics. The satellite-based winds also show positive mean biases, larger than those of the reanalysis data. All four wind products overestimate ship wind speed for weak winds (〈4 m·s-1) but underestimate for strong winds (〉10 m·s-1). Differences between the reanalysis and satellite winds are examined to identify regions with large discrepancies.
出处 《Advances in Polar Science》 2013年第3期147-152,共6页 极地科学进展(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant nos.41006115,41076128,41206184) the Marine Science Youth Fund of SOA(Grant no.2010215) the Chinese Polar Environmental Comprehensive Investigation and Assessment Programmes (Grant no.CHINARE2013-04-01).
关键词 Sea surface winds NCEP-2 ERA-40 QUIKSCAT NCDC blended sea winds Southern Ocean Sea surface winds, NCEP-2, ERA-40, QuikSCAT, NCDC blended sea winds, Southern Ocean
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Curry J A, Bentamy A, Bourassa M A, et al. SEAFLUX. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 2004, 85: 409-424.
  • 2Zhang H M, Bates J J, Reynolds R W. Assessment of composite global sampling: sea surface wind speed. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33(L17714), doi: 10.1029/2006GL027086.
  • 3Atlas R, Hoffman R N, Ardizzone J, et al. A cross-calibrated, multiplat-form ocean surface wind velocity product for meteorological and oceano- graphic applications. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2011, 92: 157-174.
  • 4Smith S R, Legler D M, Verzone K V. Quantifying uncertainties in NCEP reanalyses using high-quality research vessel observations. Journal of Climate, 2001, 14: 4062-4072.
  • 5Mears C A, Smith D K, Wentz F J. Comparison of Special Sensor Micro- wave Imager and buoy-measured wind speeds from 1987 to 1997. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001, 106:11719-11729.
  • 6Ebuchi N, Graber H C, Caruso M J. Evaluation of wind vectors observed by QuikSCAT/SeaWinds using ocean buoy data. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2002, 19: 2049-2062.
  • 7Ladd C, Bond N A. Evaluation of the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis in the NE Pacific and the Bering Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2002, 107(C10), doi: 10.1029/2001JC001157.
  • 8Renfrew I A, Moore G W K, Guest P S, et al. A comparison of sur- face-layer and surface turbulent-flux observations over the Labrador Sea with ECMWF analyses and NCEP reanalyses. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2002, 32: 383-400.
  • 9Parekh A, Sharma R, Sarkar A. A comparative assessment of surface wind speed and sea surface temperature over the Indian Ocean by TMI, MSMR,and REA-40. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2007, 24: 1131-1142.
  • 10Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, et al. NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Re- analysis(R-2). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2002, 83: 1631-1643.

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部