期刊文献+

协商民主视角下的“三三制”政权

“Triangular Organization”regime from the perspective of consultative democracy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对协商民主进行了理论分析,指出协商民主的基本特征有公共性、合法性、政治权威主导性。"三三制"政权有中国共产党的正确领导,在政权工作中与非党人士实施民主协商,充分发挥参议会这一协商民主形式的作用,实施普遍平等的选举制,因此,"三三制"政权是协商民主的雏形。"三三制"政权建设对加强社会主义协商民主建设的启示有:提高党的领导水平,扩大协商民主的主体,丰富协商的内容,创新协商民主的形式,加强协商民主制度建设等。 The paper makes a theoretical analysis of consultative democracy and points out the basic characteristics of publicness, legitimacy and political authoritative dominance. Under the leadership of the CPC, the "Triangular Organization" implements democratic consultation with non- party people in the work of the regime, gives full play to the role of the council form of consultative democracy, and practices the universal and equal election. Therefore, the "Triangular Organization" regime serves as the embryo of consultative democracy. The enlightenments of "Triangular Organization" regime to the strengthening of socialist consultative democracy construction are : to raise the leading level of the CPC, to enlarge the number of participants in consultative democracy, to innovate the form of consultative democracy and to strengthen the system construction of consultative democracy.
作者 朱磊
出处 《安徽理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第3期33-36,共4页 Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 协商民主 "三三制"政权 视角 consultative democracy "Triangular organization" regime perspective
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1陈家刚.协商民主引论[J].马克思主义与现实,2004,56(3):26-34. 被引量:340
  • 2林尚立.协商政治:对中国民主政治发展的一种思考[J].学术月刊,2003,35(4):19-25. 被引量:417
  • 3中国人民解放军政治学院党史教研室.中共党史参考资料(第9册)[C].北京:人民出版社,1979:136.
  • 4《陕甘宁边区政权建设》编辑组.陕甘宁边区参议会(资料选辑)[C].北京:中共中央党校科研办公室,1985:394.
  • 5全国县级直接选举工作办公室.陕甘宁边区选举条例(1937年5月)[C].中国选举法资料选编,1981:105.
  • 6[美]乔·萨托利 冯克利 阎克文译.民主新论[M].北京:东方出版社,1993..

二级参考文献33

  • 1Joaeph M. Bessette, "Deliberative Democracy : The Majority Principle in Republican Govemment", in How Demo-cralic Is the Constitution? eds. Robert A. Goldwin and William A. Schambra, Washington : American Enterprise Institute, 1980.P. 102 - 116.
  • 2Bernard Manin, On Legitimacy and Pditical Deliberation, Political Theory. 1987, 15:338 - 368; Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democrafic Legitimacy, Alan Hamllin and Philip Pettit eds. The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.P17- 34.
  • 3Jon Elster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.6.3.
  • 4Jon FAster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.44.
  • 5Maeve Cooke, Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies, 2000, Vol,48,P.947 - 969.
  • 6David Miller, Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups? Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives, Edited by Maurizio Pasaerin D' entreves, Manchester University Press, 2002. P.201.
  • 7Carolyn Hendriks, The Ambiguous Role of Civil Society in Deliberative Democracy, Refereed Paper Presented to the Jubilee Conference of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Australian National University, Canberra, October 2002.
  • 8Christian Hunold,Corporalism, Pluralism and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 14, No. 2, Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
  • 9Jorge M. Valadez, Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimaey, and Self- Democracy in Multicultural Societies, USA Westview Press, 2001. P. 30.
  • 10Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy, Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, The MIT press, 1997. P. 67.

共引文献769

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部