期刊文献+

食管癌手术颈部食管-胃吻合3种技术临床应用分析 被引量:9

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价食管癌根治、胃-食管重建手术颈部食管-胃3种吻合技术应用的可行性。方法经左胸开胸行双野淋巴结清扫及胃-食管重建术食管癌患者205例,依据食管-胃吻合技术不同分为圆形吻合器组87例、半机械侧侧吻合组26例与手工吻合组92例,比较3组吻合口瘘、吻合口狭窄及反流性食管炎发生率。结果术后半机械侧侧吻合组未发生吻合口瘘及吻合口狭窄,而圆形吻合器组及手工吻合组吻合口瘘发生率分别为3.4%、14.1%,吻合口狭窄发生率分别为5.7%、26.1%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),半机械侧侧吻合组与手工吻合组吻合口瘘、吻合口狭窄发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但与圆形吻合器组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手工吻合组术后反流性食管炎发生率(68.5%)高于圆形吻合器组(40.2%)与半机械侧侧吻合组(19.2%)(P<0.01)。结论在颈部食管-胃3种吻合方法中,使用圆形吻合器可降低吻合口瘘发生率,食管-胃颈部的机械吻合较手工吻合并发症低、操作简单。
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2013年第10期1034-1035,共2页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Sarela A I, Tolan D J, Harris K, et al. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer: a mortality free experience[J]. J Am Coll Surg,2008,206(3):516- 523.
  • 2潘海涛,孙国明,吴伟.改良Ivor-Lewis术式治疗食管癌临床研究[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2009,23(4):396-397. 被引量:8
  • 3郝德勋,杨鲲鹏.食管-胃胸内吻合口瘘防治现状[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2011,25(10):941-943. 被引量:8
  • 4Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand sewn and stapled in esophagogastfic anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study[J]. J Med Assoc Thai,2008,91(5) :681- 685.
  • 5Beitler A L, Urschel J D. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses[J]. Am J Surg,1998,175(4) :337- 340.
  • 6庞烈文,陈志明,马勤运,陈刚,陈佶.颈部胃食管吻合术中管状吻合器应用的体会[J].复旦学报(医学版),2006,33(1):121-123. 被引量:14
  • 7Lerut T, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Postoperative complications a{ter transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction are correlated with early cancer recurrence: role of systematic grading of complications using the modified Clavien classiIication[J]. Ann Surg,2009,250(5) :798-807.
  • 8杨光煜,邵铁良,王明,马华兵.颈段食管胃半机械侧侧吻合在食管癌治疗的临床应用[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2009,25(6):417-418. 被引量:9

二级参考文献42

共引文献35

同被引文献79

  • 1龚太乾,蒋耀光,王如文,周景海,赵云平,谭群友,马铮.食管癌术后早期并发症及死亡原因分析[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2005,12(3):173-176. 被引量:60
  • 2Stein HJ, Sendler A, Fink U, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to esophageal and gastric cancer. Surg Clin North Am, 2000, 80 (2) : 659-682.
  • 3Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, et aL A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer. Dis Esophagus, 2008,21 (5): 422-429.
  • 4Saluja SS, Ray S, Pal S, et al. Randomized trial comparing Side-to- Side stapled and Hand-Sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck. JGastrointest Surg, 2012, 16 (7) : 1287-1295.
  • 5Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Wynn B, et al. Propensity-matched anal- ysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007, 83 (5) : 1805-1813.
  • 6Casson AG, Porter GA, Veugelers PJ. Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocar- cinoma. Dis Esophagus, 2002, 15 (4) : 296-302.
  • 7Singh D, Maley RH, Santucci T, et al. Experience and technique of stapled mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001,71 (2): 419-424.
  • 8Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg, 2013,37(5): 1043-1050.
  • 9Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, et al. Linear stapled esophagogastros- tomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(6): 915-921.
  • 10Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, et al. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus, 2001, 14 (3 - 4): 212-217.

引证文献9

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部