期刊文献+

单细胞凝胶电泳联合原子力显微镜观测UVB诱导的细胞DNA损伤模式变化

Visualization of Cellular DNA Damage Mode Induced UVB by Atomic Force Microscope and Comet Assay
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:检测UVB诱导的真核细胞DNA损伤。方法:采用单细胞凝胶电泳与原子力显微镜。结果:不同照射剂量的UVB引起的真核细胞DNA损伤模式不同。在0~20 J/m2照射剂量范围内DNA无损伤;在20~360 J/m2照射剂量范围内DNA损伤程度加快;当照射剂量超过360 J/m2时DNA损伤速度减慢,实验组之间无显著性差异,出现"平台"。原子力显微镜的观察结果表明随着UVB照射剂量的增加,DNA结构的变化经历了断裂、交联与断裂并存的损伤增强趋势。当照射能量达到280 J/m2时细胞DNA大都形成断片,并相互交联在一起。这一结果表明彗星电泳检测到的UVB照射剂量达到一定剂量后,DNA损伤出现"平台"的原因可能是此时DNA发生了链内或链间交联。结论:不同照射剂量的UVB造成的细胞DNA损伤模式不同;原子力显微镜是一种比较直观的观测DNA损伤的方法。借助原子力显微镜我们可以深入了解单细胞凝胶电泳检测的原理,为DNA损伤检测提供更优良的检测手段。 Objective: The damage of cellular DNA induced by UVB were examined. Methods: Atomic force microscope (AFM) and were applied. Results: The results showed that the mode of cellular DNA damage induced by different doses of UVB were different. Within 0 - 20J/m2 dose no DNA damage; within 20 - 360 J/m2 dose occurs the DNA damage, injury level is proportional to the radiation dose; when the radiation doses greater than 360 J/m2 the DNA damage slowed down, the injuries were no significant differences between groups (P〉 0.05). Low-energy UVB irradiation, the cellular DNA damage was manifested mainly DNA strand breaks and strand breaks were not serious, accompanied by chain thicker; while high-dose UVB irradiation (280 J/mS), a large number of cells, DNA fragments, and fragments cross-linked with each other. The results of AFM showed that the reason of the plateau of comet assay might be DNA frag- ments cross-linked with each other. Conclusions: Experimental results show that the cellular DNA damage and damage type induced by UVB were a dose-dependent. AFM is an efficient method to differentiate the types of DNA damage.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2013年第27期5255-5258,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(10904087) 陕西省自然科学基金(2012JQ4003) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(GK200902033) 陕西师范大学青年基金
关键词 单细胞凝胶电泳 原子力显微镜 细胞DNA损伤 UVB Comet assay Atomic force microscope Cellular DNA damage UVB
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Sarasin A. The molecular pathways of ultraviolet-induced carcinogen- esis[J]. Murat Res,1999, 428(1-2):5-10.
  • 2Latonen L, Laiho M. Cellular UV damage responses-Func- tions of tu- mor suppressor p53 [J]. Biochimiea et Biophysica Acta, 2005, 1755: 71-89.
  • 3Nocentini S. Apoptotic response of malignant rhabdoid tumor cells[J]. Cancer cell lnt, 2003, 3:1-11.
  • 4Steerenberg PA, Daamen F, Weesendorp E, et al. No adaptation to UV-induced immunosuppression and DNA damage fol- lowing expo- sure of mice to chronic UV-exposure [J]. Journal ofPho- tochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2006, 84:28-37.
  • 5Betti C, Davini T, Giannessi L, et al. Comparative studies by comet test and SCE analysis in human lymphocytes from 200 healthy sub- jects[J]. Mutation Research,1995, 343(4): 201-207.
  • 6罗明志,齐浩,陈文芳,刘淼,郭伟.彗星实验检测紫外线诱导的K562细胞DNA损伤[J].癌变.畸变.突变,2006,18(5):400-403. 被引量:14
  • 7Sun RG,Chen WF, Qi H, et al. Biologic effects of SMF and paclitaxel on K562 human leukemia cells [J]. Gen Physiol Biophys,2012, 31:1-10.
  • 8Sarkar A, Bhagat J, Ingole BS, et al. Genotoxieity of cadmium chlo- ride in the marine gastropod Nerita chamaeleon using comet assay and alkaline tmwinding assay [J]. Environ Toxieol, 2013, Jan 27. doi: 10.1002/tox.21883.
  • 9Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: Principles, applications and limitations [J]. Molecular biotechnology, 2004, 26: 249-261.
  • 10Azqueta A, Collins AR .The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair [J]. Arch Toxicol,2013, 87(6):949-968.

二级参考文献16

  • 1杨军.DNA损伤选择性修复的分子机制[J].国外医学(遗传学分册),1994,17(6):288-291. 被引量:1
  • 2Ostling O, Johanson KJ. Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual. mammalian cells[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1984, 123(1) :291 - 298.
  • 3Olive PL. Cell proliferation as a requirement for development of the contact effect in Chinese hamster V79 spheroids[J]. Radiat Res, 1989, 117(1) :79-92.
  • 4McKelvey-Martin VJ, Green MHL, Schmezer P, et al. The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): A European review[J]. Murat Res, 1993,288(1) :47 - 63.
  • 5Fairbairn DW, Olive PL, O' Neill KL. The Comet assay: a comprehensive review[J] . Murat Res, 1995,339( 1 ) : 37 - 59.
  • 6Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR,et al. A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells[J]. Exp Cell Res, 1988, 175(1) : 184-191.
  • 7Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, et al. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology, testing[J]. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2000, 35(3):206 - 221.
  • 8Mohankumar MN, Janani S, Prabhu BK, et al. DNA damage and integrity of UV-induced DNA repair in lymphocytes of smokers analysed by the comet assay[J]. Mut Res, 2002,520(1-2) : 179 - 187.
  • 9Stapleton AE. Ultraviolet radiation and plants: burning question[J]. Plant Cell, 1992,4(11) : 1353 - 1358.
  • 10Helma C, Uhl M. A public domain image-analysis program for the single cell gel electrophoresis comet assay[J]. Mut Res,2000,466(1) :9 - 15.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部