期刊文献+

拥挤收费的政治策略

The Political Calculus of Congestion Pricing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过收费缓解交通拥堵的政治可行性取决于谁获得通行费收入。指出如果收益被分配给城市,特别是高速公路经过的城市,拥挤收费取得政治成功的可能性最大。与已有的很多建议不同,指出城市是比个体驾驶人和区域政府更有力的收益申索人。基于行为经济学和政治科学理论并结合几个大都市区的数据,对提议进行解析和阐述。在洛杉矶,潜在的拥挤收费收入估计每年接近50亿美元,将这些收入分配至高速公路经过的城市对拥挤收费的实施是有政治影响力和促进作用的。 The political feasibility of using prices to mitigate congestion depends on who receives the toll revenue. We argue that congestion pricing on freeways will have the greatest chance of political success if the revenue is distributed to cities, and par- ticularly to cities through which the freeways pass. In contrast to a number of previous proposals, we argue that cities are stronger claimants for the revenue than either individual drivers or region- al authorities. We draw on theory from behavioral economics and political science to explain our proposal, and illustrate it with da- ta from several metropolitan areas. In Los Angeles, where poten- tial congestion toll revenues are estimated to be almost $5 billion a year, distributing toll revenues to cities with freeways could be politically effective and highly progressive.
出处 《城市交通》 2013年第5期82-95,共14页 Urban Transport of China
基金 加州大学交通中心(University of California Transportation Center)对本研究的资助
关键词 拥挤收费 政治可行性 Congestion tolls Political feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Wachs M. Will congestion pricing ever be adopted?[J]. Access, 1994(4): 15-19.
  • 2Goodwin P. Solving Congestion: Inaugural Lecture of the Professorship of Transport Policy[R]. London: University College London, 1997.
  • 3Wilson J Q. The Politics of Regulation[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1980.
  • 4Bertrand M, Karlin D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J. What' s Pyschology Worth? A Field Experiment in the Consumer Credit Market[R]. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
  • 5Tullock G, Seldon A, Brady G. Government Failure [R]. Washington DC: Cato Institute, 2002.
  • 6Eliasson J, Mattsson L. Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing: Quantitative Methodology and a Case Study for Stockholm[J]. Transportation Research A, 2006, 40(7): 602-620.
  • 7Texas Transportation Institute. 2005 Urban Mobility Study[R]. Texas: Texas Transportation Institute, 2005.
  • 8Giuliano G. An Assessment of the Political Acceptability of Congestion Pricing[J]. Transportation, 1992, 19(4): 335- 358.
  • 9Anderson D, Mohring H. Congestion Costs and Congestion Pricing[M]// Greene D L, Jones D W, Delucchi M. Full Costs and Benefits of Transportation. Berlin: Springer Press, 1997.
  • 10Calfee J, Winston C. The Value of Aulomobile Travel Time: Implications for Congestion Policy[J]. Journal of Public Economic, 1998, 69(1): 83-102.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部