期刊文献+

术前应用低分子肝素对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后早期疗效的影响 被引量:1

Impact of Preoperative Use of Low-molecular-weight Heparin on Early Outcomes of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨术前应用低分子肝素(low molecular weight heparin,LMWH)对行非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting,OPCAB)患者术后早期疗效的影响。方法回顾性分析2011年4月1日至2012年9月30日中国医科大学附属第一医院809例行单纯OPCAB患者的临床资料,根据术前是否应用LMWH分为两组,LMWH组:386例,男290例,女96例;年龄49~81岁;术前停用抗血小板药物后均常规给予低分子肝素(低分子肝素钠或低分子肝素钙,4 000 U每日2次,皮下注射)抗凝治疗,直至手术前一天早晨。对照组:423例,男321例,女102例;年龄46~78岁;直接停用抗血小板药物,而不应用LMWH或其它抗凝药物。比较两组患者的死亡率、围术期心肌梗死发生率、手术时间、失血量、输血量、术后急性肾功能不全发生率等。结果 LMWH组患者术中失血量[(296±94)ml vs.(249±81)ml,P=0.03]、术后胸腔引流量[(526±159)ml vs.(410±125)ml,P=0.02]、输红细胞量[(2.6±1.1)U vs.(1.4±0.9)U,P=0.04]以及手术时间[(172±34)min vs(.154±41)min,P=0.04]均显著大于对照组,而两组间手术死亡率(1.0%vs.1.2%,P=1.00)、围术期心肌梗死发生率(4.4%vs.3.8%,P=0.55)差异无统计学意义。结论对于稳定的缺血性心脏病,术前不用LMWH可缩短手术时间、减少失血量和输血量,并不增加手术死亡率以及围术期心肌梗死的发生率。 Objective To investigate the impact of preoperative use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on early outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods Clinical data of 809 patients undergoing isolated OPCAB from April 1 st, 2011 to September 30th, 2012 in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into LMWH group and control group according to preoperative use of LMWH or not. In LMWH group, there were 386 patients including 290 male and 96 female patients with their age of 49-81 years, who routinely received anticoagulation therapy with LMWH (LMWH sodium or LMWH calcium, 4 000 U twice a day, subcutaneous injection) after discontinuation of anti-platelet therapy until the day before surgery. In the control group, there were 423 patients including 321 male and 102 female patients with their age of 46-78 years, who didn't receive LMWH or any other anticoagulant after discontinuation of anti-platelet therapy. Postoperative mortality, incidence ofperio- perative myocardial infarction (MI), operation time, amount of blood loss and transfusion, and incidence of postoperative acute renal injury were compared between the 2 groups. Results Intraoperative blood loss (296-4- 94 ml vs. 249_ 81 ml, P=0.03 ), postoperative thoracic drainage (526_ 159 ml vs. 410 ~ 125 ml, P=0.02 ), blood transfusion (2.6-4- 1.1 U vs. 1.4-4- 0.9 U, P=-0.04) and operation time ( 172-4- 34 min vs. 154-4- 41 min, P=-0.04) of LMWH group were significantly larger or longer than those of the control group. There was no statistical difference in postoperative mortality ( 1.0% vs. 1.2%, P= 1.00)or incidence ofperioperative MI (4.4% vs. 3.8%,P=0.55)between the 2 groups. Conclusion For OPCAB patients with stable ischemic heart disease, preoperative management without use of LMWH can decrease operation time and amount of blood loss and transfusion without increasing postoperative mortality or incidence of perioperative MI.
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期533-537,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
关键词 低分子肝素 冠状动脉旁路移植术 输血 Low-molecular-weight heparin Coronary artery bypass grafting Blood transfusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Holinski S, Claus B, Barajas T, et al. Cerebroprotective effect of preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 31. [Epub ahead o f print ].
  • 2Mangano DT, Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Aspirin and mortality from coronary bypass surgery. N Engl JMed, 2002, 347(17): 1309-1317.
  • 3Al-Lawati AA, Muthuswamy V. Continuing aspirin causes higher drainage even under full protection with antifibrinolytics. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 23. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 4Deja MA, Kargul T, Domaradzki W, et al. Effects of preoperative aspirin in coronary artery bypass grafting: a double-blind, placebo- controlled, randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 144 ( 1 ) : 204-209.
  • 5Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, Moliterno DJ, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons practice guideline series: aspirin and other antiplatelet agents during operative coronary revascularization (executive summary). Ann Thorac Surg, 2005, 79 ( 4 ) : 1454-1461.
  • 6Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso- ciation Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). J Am Coil Cardiol, 2004, 44 ( 5 ) : e213-310.
  • 7Handeland GF, Abildgaard U, Holm HA, et al. Dose adjusted heparin treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a comparison of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1990, 39 (2): 107-112.
  • 8Farge D, Debourdeau P, Beckers M, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous throm- boembolism in patients with cancer. J Thromb Haemost, 2013, 11(1): 56-70.
  • 9Costantino G, Ceriani E, Rusconi AM, et al. Bleeding risk dur- ing treatment of acute thrombotic events with subcutaneous LMWH compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin; a systematic review. PLoS One, 2012, 7(9): e44553.
  • 10Rothberg MB, Pekow PS, Lahti M, et al. Comparative effective- ness of low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin for thromboembolism prophylaxis for medical patients. J Hosp Med, 2012, 7(6): 457-463.

二级参考文献26

  • 1胡一辉,苏鸿熙.体外循环前后肺顺应性肺组织含水量呼吸...[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1993,9(1):70-72. 被引量:10
  • 2Kangasniemi OP,Luukkonen J.Biancari F,et al.Risk-scoring methods for p rediction of postoperative stroke after coronary artery bypass surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2006,131(3):734-735.
  • 3Arom KV,Flavin TF,Emery RW,et al.Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg,2000,69(3):704-710.
  • 4Diegeler A,Matin M,Falk V,et al.Coronary bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass-technical considerations,clinical results,and follow-up.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1999,47(1):14-18.
  • 5D'Ancona G,Karamanoukian HL,Ricci M,et al.Graft patency verification in coronary artery bypass grafting:principles and clinical applications of transit time flow measurement.Angiology,2000,51(9):725-731.
  • 6Magee MJ,Alexander JH,Hafley G,et al.Coronary artery bypass graft failure after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass:findings from prevent IV.Ann Thorac Surg,2008,85(2):494-500.
  • 7Sun X,Lim RM,Hill PC,et al.Current practice and outcomes of off-pump multivessel coronary artery bypass.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann,2009,17(4):362-367.
  • 8Raja SG,Siddiqui H,Ilsley CD,et al.In-hospital outcomes of off-pump multivessel total arterial and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting:single surgeon,single center experience.Ann Thorac Surg,2009,88(1):47-52.
  • 9Hannan EL,Racz MJ,Walford G,et al.Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation.N Engl J Med,2005,352(21):2174-2183.
  • 10Booth J,Clayton T,Pepper J,et al.Randomized,controlled trial of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease:six-year follow-up from the stent or surgery trial (SoS).Circulation,2008,118(4):381-388.

共引文献20

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部