摘要
国际组织具有缔约能力已越来越受到国际社会的普遍承认。然而这一能力必须通过组织内部某些机构行使缔约权才能加以实现。有关国际组织缔约权的行使机关的理论,主要有全会性机构行使缔约权说,执行性机构行使缔约权说以及秘书处行使缔约权说。但从实践来看,这三种学说都不免存在以偏概全的弊端。通过对实践的考察,本文认为,在章程缺乏规定的情形下,国际组织的备机构分别在其具有最终决定权的事项方面有权代表组织对外缔结条约。
The treaty-making competence of international organizations has increasingly been recognized by interna-tional society. However, it can only be realized through internal organs of international organizations by exercising the treaty-making competence. The theories concerning the organ endowed with the treaty-making competence include the theory in favor of the plenary authority, the theory in favor of the executive body, and the theory in favor of the Secretariat. In fact, these three theories are not invariable applicable. From the practice of international organizations, it may safely conclude that the treaty-making competence is in principle vested in the authority which has the final word on the same matters as the treaty will be made, unless the constituent instrument contains any provisions concerning the treaty-making power.
出处
《中南财经政法大学武汉学院学报》
2012年第1期27-31,共5页
Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law Wuhan College
关键词
国际组织
缔约权
缔约能力
International organizations
the competence to conclude treaties
the capacity to conclude treaties