财产性利益与罪刑法定问题

The Interest of Property and Principle of Legality

将财产性利益解释为财物,作为普通财产犯罪的对象,并没有彻底解决刑法中的财产性利益问题,反而导致许多新问题产生。究其原因,在于上述解释结论违反了罪刑法定原则,属于刑法禁止的类推解释。肯定论者的诸多解释理由,要么属于将侵犯财产性利益的违法行为尽快犯罪化的立法依据,要么是模糊不清、操作性差的抽象概念,再有就是无具体关系的其他刑法规定,均不足以说明对财物进行扩大解释的合理性。因此,对于侵犯财产性利益的违法行为只能以行为方式或者依特别规定入罪,否则,必须作无罪处理。

The fact that the interest of property is identified as belongings brings problems. This analogy violated the principle of legality. The reasons given about many new by scholars are unreasonable, some of which are grounds of criminalization, some of which are vague conceptions, while others of which are provisions of the Penal Code unrelated. Therefore, the violations of infringing on the right of property are convicted of offense by seriousness of conduct and special provisions of Penal Code. Otherwise, those people should be regarded as innocent in accordance with the principle of legality.