期刊文献+

乳腺超声、钼靶和增强磁共振的诊断效能比较 被引量:21

The diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound,mammography and enhanced-MR in breast lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨乳腺病变的超声、钼靶和增强磁共振检查3种最常用影像学检查方法的诊断效能。方法:收集术前完成乳腺超声、乳腺钼靶和乳腺增强磁共振检查的378个乳腺病灶。对比分析超声、钼靶、增强磁共振检查的准确性、特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值以及BI-RADS分级后各级的阳性预测值和阴性预测值。采用卡方检验计算P值,P<0.05为具有显著差异。结果:超声、钼靶和增强磁共振的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为92.81%、89.52%、90.83%,66.67%、58.20%、60.98%和98.55%、78.50%、86.43%。超声和增强磁共振的敏感性、特异性和准确性显著高于钼靶。结论:增强磁共振检查的敏感性最高,超声检查的特异性最高,两者对恶性和良性病灶的诊断各有其优势。而钼靶对恶性病灶的预测具有一定价值。 Objective: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy for breast lesions by ultrasound, mammography and enhanced- MR examinations. Methods: We collected 378 breast lesions, all had breast ultrasound, mammography and breast enhanced- MR examinations before surgical excision. The accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each modality were compared. Results: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of breast ultrasound, mammography and enhanced-MR examinations was 92.81%, 89.52%, 90.83% and 66.67%, 58.20%, 60.98% and 98.55%, 78.50%, 86.43% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of breast ultrasound and enhanced-MR were higher than mammography. Conclusion: Enhanced-MR had the highest sensitivity, ultrasound had the highest specificity. They both had advantages to diagnose malignant or benign lesions. Also mammography was useful to predict malignant lesions.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2013年第10期688-690,694,共4页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 超声检查 多普勒 乳房X线摄影术 磁共振成像 Breast neoplasms Uhrasonography, Doppler Mammography Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2010, 60(5): 277-300.
  • 2U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2002, 137(5 Part 1): 344-346.
  • 3Greene T, Coeilovo C, Estabrook A, et al. A single institution review of new breast malignancies identified solely by sonography [J]. J Am Coil Surg, 2006, 203(6): 894-898.
  • 4Kinkel K, Helbieh TH, Essorman LJ, et al. Dynamic high-spatial resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobsorber variability[J]. Am Roentgenol, 2000, 175 (1): 35.
  • 5American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS-Uhrasound [M]//ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breasthnaging Atlas. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  • 6American College of Radiology(ACR). ACR BI-RADS-Mammogra- phy[M]//ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  • 7American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS-Magnetic Resonance Imaging [M]//ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston: American College of Radi- ology, 2003.
  • 8Habel LA, Capra AM, Oestreicher N, et al. Mammographie densi- ty in amuhiethnic cohort[J]. Mellopallse, 2007, 14(5): 891-899.
  • 9康敏,庞轶,李佳圆,刘莲花,刘星涛.钼靶X线在亚洲女性乳腺癌筛查中的准确性评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(3):212-216. 被引量:21
  • 10Nothacker M, Duda V, Halan M, et al. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast uhrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue: a systematic review[J]. BMC Cancer, 2009, 20(9): 335.

二级参考文献30

  • 1赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:146
  • 2汪晓红,彭卫军,杨文涛,顾雅佳,杨天锡.乳腺纤维腺瘤的MRI表现及与病理对照[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):467-471. 被引量:28
  • 3Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Correlation of lesion appearance and histologic findings for the nodes of a breast MR imaging interpretation model[J]. Radiographics, 1999,19(1):79-92.
  • 4Kramer SC, Rieber A, Gorich J, et al. Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography[J]. Eur Radiol, 2000,10(11):1733-1736.
  • 5Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion- weighted imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002,16(2): 172-178.
  • 6Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography [J]. Radiology, 1992, 184(3):613-617.
  • 7Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O'Shaughnessy KF, et al. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening[J]. Radiology, 2003,226(2):494-503.
  • 8Kuhl CK. MRI of breast tumor[J]. Eur Radiol, 2000,10 (1):46-58.
  • 9Riedl CC, Pfarl G, Helbich TH. Breast imaging reporting and date system (BI-RADS)[M]. 1st ed. Reston VA: American College of Radiology,2003:98.
  • 10Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach[J]. Radiology,1999,213(3):881-888.

共引文献47

同被引文献150

引证文献21

二级引证文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部