期刊文献+

腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术24例临床报告 被引量:7

Clinic study of laparoscopic rectal radical excision: report of 24 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的安全性及可行性。方法:对2007年1月至2011年6月,24例行腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术与同期51例行开腹直肠癌根治术患者进行手术情况、近期疗效、手术根治程度以及随访1年内并发症情况进行回顾性比较。结果:二者在保肛率、清扫淋巴结以及近远期并发症方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在手术失血量、术后排气时间、术后拔尿管时间、术后住院天数以及直肠肿瘤远端切缘方面,腹腔镜组优于开腹组(P<0.01)。在手术时间方面,开腹组优于腹腔镜组(P<0.01)。结论:腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的根治性及安全性达到传统开腹手术标准,具有可行性。 Objective: To investigate the safety and feasiblity of the laparoscopic rectal radical excision. Methods: We made a retrospective study of 75 patients of rectal cancer from January 2007 to June 2011,24 patients treated by laparoscopic rectal radical excision were the experiment group, the other 51 patients treated with open surgery were the control group. Results:There were no statistical differences in the probability of anus reservation, the number of the average cleaned lymph nodes, long and short term complications between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). There were sta- tistical differences in the amount of bleeding during operation, anal exhaust time, hospital stay, the time of remove catheter after operation and the length of distal clearance between the two groups(P 〈 0.01 ), experiment group was better than control group. The time of open surgery was shorter than that of laparoscopic rectal radical excision, there was statistical differences between the two groups (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion:The safety and radical degree of laparo- scopic rectal radical excision were up to standard of the open surgery. It is feasible operation plan of rectal cancer
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2013年第10期2273-2275,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术 安全性 可行性 laparoscopic rectal radical excision safety feasiblity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献53

  • 1池畔,林惠铭.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术学习曲线[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(5):372-374. 被引量:54
  • 2郑民华,冯波.从循证医学谈腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌手术的比较[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(11):676-678. 被引量:37
  • 3王存,周总光,徐丹,于永扬,程中,李立.直肠癌系膜切缘和盆腔侧方转移规律的研究及生存分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(6):474-476. 被引量:10
  • 4Hong D, Lewis M, Tabet J, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open resection for benign colorectal disease, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002, 12 : 238-242.
  • 5Pikarsky A J, Rosenthal R, Weiss EG, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16:558-562.
  • 6Ziprin P, Ridgway PE, Peck DH, et al. The theories and realities of port-site metastases: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Surg, 2002,195: 395-408.
  • 7Neuhaus SJ, Watson DI, Ellis T, et al. The effect of immune enhancement and suppression of the development of laparoscopic port site metastases. Surg Endosc, 2004, 14: 439-443.
  • 8Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holuber SD, et al, Postoperative cell mediated immune respose is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17: 972-978.
  • 9Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Bonier HJ. Effect of laparoscopy on the immune system. Semin Laparosc Surg, 2004, 11: 37-44.
  • 10Ordemann J, Jacobi CA, Schwenk W, et al. Cellular and humoral inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15:600-608.

共引文献259

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部