优秀的论文摘要:一篇浓缩版论文

A standard abstract: An abbreviated academic paper

对2010—2012年《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》发表的1069篇论文进行质量后评价。发现仍存在摘要的研究目的部分不简练、研究方法部分不清晰、结果和结论部分不具体的问题。统计结果表明:表述不佳的论文摘要有149篇,占摘要总数的13.9%;总体满足Ei的要求,但还有提高质量的空间。

This paper analyzes 1069 academic papers published in Journal of Tsinghua University （Science and Technology） to evaluate the quality of abstracts. Some abstracts were found to have redundant research aim expression, vague study method expression, and conclusions without specifics. Statistical results show that 13.9% of the abstracts do not well agree with the Ei standard. Therefore, improvement should be made by both authors and editors.