期刊文献+

环境绩效与环境信息披露:基于高新技术企业与传统企业的比较 被引量:17

Environmental Performance and Environmental Information Disclosure:a Comparative Analysis on High-tech Enterprises and Traditional Enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 以中国重污染行业上市公司为样本,分析了高新技术企业和传统企业在环境绩效和环境信息披露上的差异。结果表明:两类企业的环境绩效水平和环境信息披露充分性均呈较低水平;在西部地区,高新技术企业较之于传统企业环境绩效水平显著更低;西部地区企业整体环境信息披露相对欠充分,进一步分类比较发现,西部地区高新技术企业较当地传统企业在环境信息披露方面做得更差;虽然不论哪个地区哪类企业的环境绩效对环境信息披露都存在显著正向效应,但这种效应在西部地区的高新技术企业中不及当地传统企业明显。 Based on the data from listed enterprises in Shanghai Stock Exchange Market, this study examines the differences between high-tech enterprises and traditional enterprises on environmental performance and environmental information disclosure in heavy polluting industries from the national level and regional level. The results indicate: the environmental performance and environmental information disclosure of two types enterprises all take the low level; as for environmental performance, the high^tech enterprises are significantly worse than the traditional enterprises in the western regions; as for environmental information disclosure, the enterprises in western regions are significantly less sufficient than others, and the high-tech enterprises are significantly worse than traditional enterprises in western regions; although environmental performance has a significantly positive effects on environmental information disclosure in all enterprises, however, this effects in western high-tech enterprises is significantly less distinct than traditional enterprises in western regions.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期117-130,共14页 Management Review
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC630016) 上海市科技发展基金软科学研究项目(11692104300)
关键词 环境绩效 环境信息披露 传统企业 高新技术企业 environmental performance, environmental information disclosure, traditional enterprises~ high-tech enter-prises
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1牛海鹏,朱艳春,尹训国,张平淡.治污减排对经济发展影响的最新研究进展及启示[J].管理评论,2011,23(7):34-42. 被引量:9
  • 2Aragoncorra J. A., Sharma S. A. A Contingent Resource-based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strat?egy[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003,28(1):71-88.
  • 3汪克亮,杨宝臣,杨力.基于环境效应的中国能源效率与节能减排潜力分析[J].管理评论,2012,24(8):40-50. 被引量:58
  • 4McLaughlin S. Valuing Potential Environmental Liabilities for Managerial Decision-making: A Review of Available Techniques(MJ. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency, 1999.
  • 5Keirn G. Managerial Behavior and the Social Responsibilities Debate: Goals Versus Constraints[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1978,21(1):57-68.
  • 6Ullmann A. Data in Search of a Theory a Critical Examination of the Relationship among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performancel.I]. Academy of Management Review, 1985,10(3):450-477.
  • 7Pascual B., Luis R. G. Environmental Performance and Executive Compensation: An Integrated Agency-institutional Perspectivej.I]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009,52(1):103-126.
  • 8Walls J. L., Pascual B. Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: Is There Really a Link?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012,33(8):885-913.
  • 9Charl V., Naiker V. The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance[J]. Journal of Manage?ment, 2011,37(6):1636-1663.
  • 10Cheng L. H., Fan H. K. Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence from Taiwanj.I], Journal of Business Ethics, 2010,96(3):435-451.

二级参考文献107

共引文献551

同被引文献268

引证文献17

二级引证文献282

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部