中国上市物流公司成本效率收敛分析被引量：14

Convergence Research of Cost Efficiency of Chinese Logistics Public Companies

导出

摘要本文旨在关注近几年上市物流公司成本效率的变化趋势和入世对物流业成本效率变化趋势的影响。首先应用NEW-COST-DEA模型对20家上市物流公司2000-2009年间的成本效率做了测算,结果显示20家上市物流企业成本效率普遍较低。10年均值只有54.25%,还有46%的提升空间。接着应用面板β,σ收敛和PAM模型考察了物流上市公司成本效率的收敛趋势和收敛方向。结果显示20家物流上市公司的成本效率在10年中存在收敛趋势,但收敛趋势反映的不是成本效率水平的普遍提高,却是效率水平的退化。但发现2005年12月物流市场开放促进了成本效率水平向效率前沿的收敛,且向前沿的收敛速度也得到提高。 The paper studies the trends and changes of cost efficiencies for 17 logistics public companies during 2000- 2009 by NEW-COST-DEA, SUPER-CCR-DEA and SUPER-BCC-DEA models. The result shows that the average cost efficiency is only 54.25%. There is still a long way to go to promote new cost efticiencies. This paper evaluates the recent dynamics of public logistics companies of cost efficiency by means of data envelopment analysis （DEA）. β-convergence ＆ σ-convergence are used to assess the trend and direction at which logistics markets are integrating. We also employ a partial adjustment model to evaluate convergence towards best practice. Results do not seem to provide supporting evidence of convergence of efficiency levels towards an average. Nevertheless, there is evidence of an overall improvement of efficiency levels towards best practice after entering WTO. And advices are given in the end according to the results.

作者张毅牛冲槐

机构地区太原理工大学经济管理学院

出处《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第9期167-176,共10页 Management Review

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70973086) 山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究一般项目(2011204)

关键词 NEW-COST模型成本效率上市物流公司收敛面板回归 NEW-COST model, cost efficiency, logistics public company, convergence, panel regression

分类号 F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献35

1中国物流行业分析报告(2001年4季度-2009年1季度)[EB].中经网统计数据库,2009.
2丁俊发.关于大力发展现代服务业的几点建议[J/OL].中国物流网http://www.chinawuliu.com.cn,2006-04-28.
3莫鸿,陈圻,刘豫.中国物流业发展中的体制性障碍因素调查--江苏省实地调查报告[J].统计研究,2008,25(8):35-39. 被引量：11
4国务院关于印发物流业调整和振兴规划的通知[EB].中央政府门户网站,http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2009-03/13/content-1259194.htm.
5Fare R., Grosskopf S., Norris M., et al. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industri?alized Countriesj.I], American Economic Review, 1994,84(1):66-83.
6Marti'n-Oliver A., Salas-Fuma's V., Saurina J. A Test of the Law of One Price in Retail Banking[J). Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2007,39(8):2021-2040.
7De Graeve F., De Jonghe 0., Vennet R. V. Competition, Transmission and Bank Pricing Policies: Evidence from Belgian Loan and Deposit Markets[J). Journal of Banking & Finance, 2007,31(1):259-278.
8Casu B., Girardone C. Bank Competition, Concentration and Efficiency in the Single European Marketl.I]. The Manchester School, 2006,74(4):441-468.
9Tortosa-Ausina E. Exploring Efficiency Differences Over Time in the Spanish Banking Industry[J). European Journal of Operational Research, 2002,139(3):643-664.
10Weill L. Convergence In Banking Efficiency across European Countriesl.I]. Journal ofInternational Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 2009,19(5):818-833.