我国庭前会议制度的不足与完善——兼论公诉人之应对

Deficiencies and Perfection of the Pretrial Conference Institution——Hold Concurrently the Answer of Procurators

庭前会议制度是2012年修订后的《刑事诉讼法》新增设的程序,该制度在实现尊重与保障人权价值、实现司法公正及提高诉讼效率方面具有重要意义。但该制度在我国立法及司法领域仍存在不足,体现在提起主体不明、书记员可否参会不明、会议决定效力不明及缺乏监督四个方面。对此,一方面应从制度上进行相应的完善,另一方面作为公诉人,应贯彻刑事诉讼三项基本理念,强化与辩、审方的程序性事项沟通,强化证据的完善以及强化公诉与审判的衔接来促进公诉工作更为顺利地开展。

The pretrial conference institution is a new procedure in the 2012 amending Chinese Criminal Procedure Law. It is deeply necessary to intreduce this institution because it can achieve the goal of justice, improve the benefit of law suit. However, there are some deficiencies in the legislative and judicial field and we should take measures to perfect the institution. As procurators, they can promote the public prosecution work by carrying out criminal procedure idea and so on.