期刊文献+

山区桥梁墩柱抗落石冲击防护措施的耐撞性 被引量:6

Crashworthiness of the protective measures for mountain bridge piers under impact load of rockfall
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究山区桥梁钢筋混凝土桥梁墩柱抗落石冲击防护措施的耐撞性,基于现场调查,采用显式非线性动力分析方法,结合部分模型试验结果,针对外套钢板筒与加厚素混凝土保护层这两种典型的防护措施展开了数值模拟。采用Holmquist-Johnson-Cook(HJC)损伤本构模拟钢筋混凝土,落石冲击模型则参照欧洲被动防护网试验规范;结合桥墩受落石冲击破坏的特点,对落石试验模型的撞击面做了加肋处理。研究了钢板筒厚度、混凝土保护层厚度变化对耐撞性的影响。结果表明,当钢板筒厚度大于20 mm、保护层厚度大于100 mm时,方可获得较好的耐撞性,同时针对粘结式外套钢板筒防护措施的不足,进一步提出了分离式外套钢板筒的改进措施。 In order to investigate erashworthiness of the protective measures for mountain bridge piers under impact load of rockfall, numerical simulations were conducted according to two typical protective measures, adding steel plate tube and thickening concrete protective layer, with the methods of explicit nonlinear dynamic analysis based on field investigation and some model test results. Holmquist-Johnson-Cook (HJC) damage constitution model was chosen to simulate reinforced concrete,and the rockfall specimen was built with reference to the test specification of the European passive safety net. According to failure characteristics of bridge piers under impact load,the contact surfaces of rockfall specimen were stiffened with three steel plates. The influence of the thickness variation of concrete protective layer and steel plate tube on crashworthiness was analyzed. The results indicated that a better crashworthiness could be obtained when the thickness of steel plate tube was greater than 20 mm or the thickness of protective layer was greater than 100 mm. Furthermore, an improvement measure that was separate-contacted steel plate tube was raised to overcome the disadvantage of bonded steel plate tube.
出处 《四川建筑科学研究》 2013年第5期11-15,共5页 Sichuan Building Science
基金 国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2009BAJ28B01) 中央高校科研基金资助项目(SWJTU09ZT03)
关键词 冲击防护 耐撞性 数值模拟 山区桥梁 HJC本构 rockfall impact crashworthiness numerical simulation mountain bridge HJC model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1西南交通大学土木工程学院.西部山区桥梁墩柱落石撞击调查分析报告[R].成都,2011.
  • 2Williams G D,et al. Response of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Col- umns Subjected to Blast Loads [ J]. Journal of Structural Engineer- ing,2011,137(9) :903-913.
  • 3Fujikake K, Li B, Socun S. Impact Response of Reinforced Con- crete Beam and Its Analytical Evaluation [ J]. Joumal of Structural Engineering,2009,135 ( 8 ) :938 -950.
  • 4Lu Y E, Zhang L M. Analysis of failure of a bridge foundation un- der rock impact. Acta Geotechnica,2012,7:57-68.
  • 5Schellenberg K, Volkwein A, Roth A, et al. Large-scale impact tests on rock fall galleries. Proceedings of the 7 ~ (th) International Conference on Shock and Impact Loads on Structures ,[J] ,2007.
  • 6陈炜,肖波,高宗余.武汉天兴洲公铁两用长江大桥1号墩防撞设计与分析[J].世界桥梁,2006,34(2):78-80. 被引量:10
  • 7谢素超,田红旗,姚松.车辆吸能部件的碰撞试验与数值仿真[J].交通运输工程学报,2008,8(3):1-5. 被引量:38
  • 8陈秉智,车全伟,谢素明,兆文忠.上海地铁6-8号线吸能结构的抗撞性优化[J].大连交通大学学报,2011,32(4):6-10. 被引量:5
  • 9四川省交通厅交通勘察设计研究院.G213线川主寺至汶川公路灾后复建工程两阶段施工图设计[R].成都,2009.
  • 10Peila D, Ronco C. Technical Note: Design of rockfall net fences and the new ETAG 027 European guideline [ J ]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2009,9 : 1291-1298.

二级参考文献30

共引文献116

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部