摘要
萌萌《记忆中"曾经"的承诺》是对寇眉《拯救性复仇》的评注,对比考察这两篇论文发现:为了让"复仇"成为"拯救性的复仇",通过取道于本雅明和海德格尔,寇眉要"让尼采回归他自身",实际是让尼采的Widerwille从"恶意"转换到"反抗意志",让"权力意志"中的"意志"反抗"权力";在萌萌看来,尽管寇眉"拯救性的复仇"目的是为了超出"形而上学复仇",但仍然是没有真正摆脱西方"形而上学"的"政治哲学复仇",要想对"复仇"自身进行"拯救",只有寻求到一种从根本上摆脱并能反省、制衡"权力意志"的思想才有可能。
" Once" Promise in Memory is Meng Meng' s comment on Rebecca Comay' s Redeeming Revenge. By comparatively researching the two articles, this paper states that, in order to make "revenge" become "re-deeming revenge", Comay, by virtue of Benjamin and Herdegger, intends "to return Nietzsche to himself", which actually transforms Nietzsche' s Widerwille from "ill will" to "counter-will", and also makes "will" in Nietzsche' s "will to power" fight against "power". In the view of Meng Meng, Comay' s "redeeming revenge", although for the purpose of going beyond "revenge of metaphysics", cal philosophy" in the western "metaphysics". Therefore only by fails to truly get rid of the "revenge of politi-seeking the thought that can not only funda-mentally get rid of, but also reflect on and contend with "will to power" will it be possible to redeem the "re-venge" itself.
出处
《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2013年第5期22-31,共10页
Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)