期刊文献+

论环境民事公益诉讼的适格原告 被引量:7

On the Suitable Qualified Plaintiffs in the Litigation of Environmental Public Interest
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2012年新修改的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第55条规定,"法律规定的机关和有关组织"可以对"污染环境等损害社会公共利益的行为"向人民法院提起诉讼,由此揭开了我国环境民事公益诉讼的新篇章。但是,新修改的《民事诉讼法》并没有进一步明确"法律规定的机关"和"有关组织"的范围。通过对环境民事公益诉讼司法实践的考察和分析,环境保护行政机关应该作为环境民事公益诉讼最适格的原告、检察机关可以作为环境民事公益诉讼的适格原告,二者应当属于"法律规定的机关"的范围;"有关组织"宜界定为以环境保护为主旨,经依法登记或者免予登记的非营利性社会团体、民办非企业单位、基金会等提供环境公益性服务的组织。 New amending Article 55 of the Civil Procedure Law first originates that the authorities provided by law and the relevant organizations can lodge a lawsuit with the court for environmental pollution. And it opens a new chapter of the civil litigation for environmental public interest in China. But the authorities provided by law are un- clear. It also needs to be demonstrated that whether the authorities include the prosecution. Furthermore, the rele- vant organizations need to be defined the scope. Aiming at the analysis about juridical practice of the civil subject qualification of the authorities provided by law and the relevant organizations, it proposes that the environmental ad-ministrative authorities should be the most suitable qualified litigants in the environment public interest litigation, and the procuratorial organs could act as qualified litigants in the environment public interest litigation. And then it makes recommendations that the relevant organizations should be defined as the one offering environmental public in-terest services just like the non - profit social groups , the non - enterprise units and the foundation which is aiming at protecting the environment , registered according to law or exempted from registered.
作者 乔刚
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 2013年第5期71-77,共7页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 2013年国家社科一般项目:<我国碳捕获与封存立法研究>(13BFX133)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 环境民事公益诉讼 法律规定的机关 有关组织 适格原告 the environmental public interest litigation the authorities provided by law the relevant organiza-tions the suitable qualified plaintiffs
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1无锡市人民检察院,无锡市人民法院.关于办理环境民事公益诉讼案件的试行规定[A].王立.环保法庭案例选编[C].北京:法律出版社,2012.
  • 2李萱.完善行政机制优化监管能力[N].中国环境报,2012-1-4.
  • 3中华环保联合会.中国环保民间组织发展状况报告[N].中国环境报,2006-04-28.
  • 4马梅风.关于检察机关参与环境公益诉讼的几点思考[J].民主与法制,2012,5.
  • 5云南省高级人民法院全省法院环境保护审判庭建设及审理环境保护案件座谈会纪要[EB/OL].http://www.doe88.com/p-497273740093.html,2013~04-05.
  • 6王社坤·检察机关在环境公益诉讼中的法律地位及作用调研报告[A].曾晓东,周珂.中国环境法治(上)[C].北京:法律出版社.2012.
  • 7王立:《环保法庭案倒选编》,法律出版社2012年版,第3-9页.
  • 8田成有.云南法院破解环境司法保护困局有"招术"--专访云南省高级人民法院副院长、新闻发言人田成有[DB/OL].htcp://vn.yunnan.cn/html/2011-06/10/content_1657837.htm2013-04-05.
  • 9孙佑海.关注《民事诉讼法》修改特别报道:制度破冰——环境公益诉讼师出有名[N].中国环境报,2012—09—06(3).
  • 10张丰芹,曾祥生.我国环境公益诉讼原告资格制度的现状及出路[A].2009年全国环境资源法学研讨会(昆明)论文集[C].

二级参考文献7

共引文献25

同被引文献119

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部