期刊文献+

涡轮机磨断牙冠法拔除下颌近中或水平阻生智齿的临床研究 被引量:6

Clinical research on mandible wisdom teeth extraction in low mesioangular impaction or horizontal impaction by high-speed air turbine drill
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨涡轮机磨断牙冠法(冠磨断法)拔除下颌近中或水平阻生智齿的效果。方法 2000—2013年因近中或水平阻生而被拔除的下颌第三磨牙共290例(290颗)。遵循不同患者意愿,采用传统的劈冠法或冠磨断法,拔除下颌近中或水平阻生智齿,并将两组每牙拔除平均耗时、术后反应进行比较分析。结果采用劈冠法拔除128颗,拔除每牙平均耗时(53.0±11.3)min,术后重度反应发生率为54.7%(70/128),中、轻度反应发生率为45.3%(58/128);冠磨断法拔除162颗,拔除每牙平均耗时(36.0±9.4)min,术后重度反应发生率为27.8%(45/162),中、轻度反应发生率为72.2%(117/162)。两组拔牙平均耗时、术后重度反应比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论冠磨断法拔除下颌近中或水平阻生智齿,比劈冠法手术时间短、术后重度反应轻、患者对拔牙恐惧心理小、对操作者的心理压力小,是一种科学、可行的拔牙方法。 Objective To explore the efficacy of high-speed turbine drill on wisdom teeth extraction in low mesioangu- lar impaction or horizontal impaction. Methods A total of 290 cases of third molar (290 teeth ) in low mesioangular impaction or horizontal impaction extracted from 2000 to 2013 were selected. Followed the patients' willingness ,the traditional corona-splitting and corona-grinding with turbine were adopted to extract mandible wisdom teeth in low mesioangular impaction and horizontal impaction. The average time-consuming of extraction for each tooth and postoeprative reactions by the two methods were analyzed comparatively. Results 128 teeth were extracted by corona-splitting, the average time-consuming of extraction for each tooth was (53.0-+ 11.3 )minutes with the incidence rate of postoperative servere reaction of 54.7% (70/128) and incidence rate of moderate and light reaction of 45.3% (58/128). 162 teeth were extracted by corona-grinding with turbine, the average time-consuming of ex- traction for each tooth was (36.0-+9.4)minutes with the incidence rate of postoperative servere reaction of 27.8% (45/162) and inci- dence rate of moderate and light reaction of 72.2% (117/162). The comparason of the mean time-consuming for extraction and postoperative reactions between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.O1). Conclusion Compared to the traditional method of corona-splitting, corona-grinding with turbine is with shorter operative time,less postoperative reaction,less psychological afraid of patients to extraction,less psychological pressure of operator to extract mandible wisdom teeth in low mesioangular im- paction and horizontal impaction, therefore, it is an scientific and feasible method of tooth extraction.
作者 甘雨
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2013年第18期2735-2736,共2页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词 牙冠 拔牙 阻生 冠磨断法 劈冠法 下颌智齿 Tooth crown Tooth extraction Tooth,impacted Crown worn method Crown law chop The mandibular wisdom tooth
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献52

共引文献79

同被引文献69

  • 1王霄,潘向勇.涡轮机法拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2006,22(1):21-24. 被引量:28
  • 2向国林,朱声荣,汤国雄,魏望萍.碘伏明胶海绵在预防下颌阻生智齿拔除术后干槽症的作用[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2006,22(7):422-423. 被引量:21
  • 3周建国,步中琦,朱亚芳.下颌第三磨牙阻生两种拔除术的并发症比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(3):250-252. 被引量:16
  • 4刘志敏,朱枝莲,张建国,黄健.口腔颌面外科医疗纠纷的原因分析及对策[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(3):255-258. 被引量:2
  • 5Bamgbose BO,Akinwand JA,Adeymo WL,et al.Effects of coadministered dexamethasone and diclofenac potassium on pain,swelling and trismus following third molar surgery[J] .Head face Med,2005,7(1):11.
  • 6Swanson AE.Prevention of dry sockel:an overview[J] .Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1990,70(2):131-136.
  • 7Libersa P,Savignat M,Tonnel A.Neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve:a retrospective study of complaints in a 10-year period[J] .J Oral Maxillofac Sarg,2007,65(8):1486-1489.
  • 8张锡泽,邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学[M] .第2版,北京:人民卫生出版社,1993:101-102.
  • 9Ritzau M,Hilleru PS,Branebjerg PE,et al.Does metronidazole prevent alveolitis sicca dolorosa?A double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical study[J] .Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2001,39(2):299-302.
  • 10Ren YF,Malmstrom HS.Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molor surgery:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials[J] .J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2007,65(10):1909-1921.

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部