期刊文献+

实施以卫生信息化为基础的比较效益研究 被引量:1

Implementing Comparative Effectiveness Research Based on Health Information Infrastructure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较效益研究受到各国管理者和医学相关学者的关注,它是在循证医学的理念基础之上的拓延。比较效益研究以完善的卫生信息化为基础,采用数据挖掘等技术,采集来自于临床实践的有利于临床决策的信息,进行大样本的前瞻性临床研究和患者临床结果的分析等,从而生成新证据支持患者和医疗机构做出更好的临床选择。将比较效益研究引入卫生系统,将有助于规范诊疗行为、改进诊疗质量和改善卫生服务的成本效益比,从而进一步提高健康全过程管理水平。 Comparative effectiveness research has received considerable attention among the policymakers and medicine related scholars of many countries, and it is the extension of evidence based medicine. Clinical decision-making related information is collected through data mining technology on the basis of health information infrastructure, and prospective clinical studies with large sample are undertaken and clinical outcomes are analyzed to generate new evidence to support the patients and medical institutions to make better clinical choices. Introducing comparative effectiveness research into health system will help standardize the diagnosis and treatment process, and improve medical quality and cost-effectiveness of health service aimed at enhancing the level of whole process health management.
作者 徐金耀
出处 《医学与哲学(B)》 2013年第9期1-3,共3页 Medicine & Philosophy(B)
关键词 比较效益研究 卫生系统 卫生信息化 数据挖掘 comparative effectiveness research, health system, health information, data mining
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Peddicord D,Waldo A B, Boutin M, et al. A proposal to protect privacy of health information while accelerating comparative effectiveness research[J]. Health Affairs,2010,29(11)=2082--2090.
  • 2Sox H C. Defining comparative effectiveness research:the importance of getting it right'[J]. Medical Care, 201 O, 48 (6) : $7 -- $8.
  • 3Institute of Medicine (IOM). Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research[R]. Washington, DC: The National AcademiesPress,2009.
  • 4Manchikanti L, Falco F J, Boswell M V, et al. Facts, Fallacies and Politics o{ Comparative E{fectiveness Research Part I. Basic Considera- tions[J]. Pain Physician, 2010,13 (1) z E23-- E54,.
  • 5Cheng J S,Wu D B,Wen Y W,et al. Biosignatures= Comparative effectiveness research in biomarker clinical studies[J]. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association,2012,111(6):300 304.
  • 6刘建平.非随机研究的系统评价[J].中国循证医学,2001,1(3):137-139. 被引量:35
  • 7Tunis S R, Benner J, McClellan M. Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure[J]. Statistics in Medicine,2010,29(19) =1963--1976.
  • 8Djulbegovic M, Djulbegovic B. Implications of the Principle of Question Propagation for Comparative Effectiveness and " Data Mining" Research[J]. JAMA, 2011,305(3) : 298--299.
  • 9周广芸,于海平.基于数据挖掘技术的医学图像信息管理系统[J].中国医药科学,2012,2(14):169-170. 被引量:3
  • 10HanJ,KamberM.数据挖掘概念与技术[M].范明,孟小峰,译.2版.北京:机械工业出版社,2006:1-3.

二级参考文献73

  • 1张莉.基于C/S和B/S结构的图书管理系统的设计与实现[J].科技信息,2008(24). 被引量:3
  • 2罗可,林睦纲,郗东妹.数据挖掘中分类算法综述[J].计算机工程,2005,31(1):3-5. 被引量:62
  • 3皋永利.中医理论的发展需要走出哲学层面[J].亚太传统医药,2006,2(3):8-10. 被引量:1
  • 4中共中央国务院.关于深化医药卫生体制改革的意见[N].健康报,2009.4.7.
  • 5Butle N,Miller RA,Perry D.New model of health promotion and disease prevention for the 21st century[J].BMJ, 2008,337:399.
  • 6Deming WE.Out of the crisis[M].Cambridge,MIT Press,2000.
  • 7Schroeder SA.We can do better improving the health of the American people[J].N Engl J Med, 2007,357:1221-1228.
  • 8Glasziou P,Burls A,Gilbert R.Evidence based medicine and the medical curriculum[J].BMJ,2008,337:a1253.
  • 9Editorials.Evidence based medicine:what it is and what it isn't[J].BMJ 1996,312:71-72.
  • 10Snyderman R,Yoediono Z.Prospective health care and the role of academic medicine[J].Acad Med, 2008,83:707-714.

共引文献68

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部