实习教师课堂情绪与教师效能感的关系——情绪调节的中介作用被引量：7

导出

摘要以华中师范大学214名实习教师为研究对象,通过问卷调查法探究了实习教师课堂情绪与效能感之间的关系,以及情绪调节策略对这一关系的影响。研究结果表明,教师在实习期间的积极课堂情绪体验对于教师效能感有促进作用,消极课堂情绪体验对于教师效能感有阻碍作用。认知重评在课堂情绪体验与教师效能感的关系中起中介作用,表达抑制中介作用不显著。

作者龚少英张扩滕张盼盼李佳蔚

机构地区华中师范大学心理学院

出处《教育研究与实验》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期66-70,共5页 Educational Research and Experiment

基金教育部人文社科基金(13YJA190005) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费重大科研培育项目(CCNU11CO1005) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金科研项目(120002040498) 华中师范大学心理学高等学校特色专业建设项目

关键词积极情绪消极情绪认知重评表达抑制教师效能感

分类号 G441 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Hostani R, Imai-Matsumura K. Emotional experience, expression and regulation of high-quality Japanese elementary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2011, 27.
2BaI.ldura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory ofBehavioral Change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84.
3Kavanagh DJ., Bower GH.. Mood and Self-Efficacy: Im- pact of Joy and Sadness on Perceived Capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research,1985,9.
4Sutton RE.. Emotional regulation goals and strategies of teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 2004, 7.
5Gross JJ.. Antecedent-and Response-Focused Emotion Regulation: Divergent Consequences for Experience, Expression, and Physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 7d.
6程利,袁加锦,何媛媛,李红.情绪调节策略:认知重评优于表达抑制[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(4):730-735. 被引量：150
7Giuliani NR., McRae K, & Gross JJ.. The Up-and Down-Regulation of Amusement: Experiential, Behavioral and Autonomic Consequences. Emotion, 2008, 8.
8Gross JJ., Levenson RW.. Hiding feelings: The Acute Ef- fects of Inhibiting Negative and Positive Emotion. Journal of Ab- normal Psychology, 1997, 106.
9Tschannen-Moran M, Hoy AW. Teacher efficacy: captur- ing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2001, 17.
10龙君伟,曹科岩.教师组织公民行为与教学效能感的关系研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(4):874-877. 被引量：33

二级参考文献42

1黄敏儿,郭德俊.原因调节与反应调节的情绪变化过程[J].心理学报,2002,34(4):371-380. 被引量：120
2武欣,吴志明,张德.组织公民行为研究的新视角[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(2):211-218. 被引量：78
3Anderson, A. K., & Phelps, E. A. (2001). Lesions of the human amygdale impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature, 411,305-309.
4Barcelo, F., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients. Neuropsychologia, 40, 349-356.
5Barch, D. M., Braver, T. S., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T., Ollinger, J., & Snyder, A. (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of response modality and processing domain. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 837-848.
6Blair, K,S., Smith, B.W., Mitchell, D. G. V., Morton, M., Pessoa, V. L., Fridberg, D., et al. (2007). Modulation of emotion by cognition and cognition by emotion. Neruolmage, 35, 430-440.
7Cavada, C., Company, T., Tejedor, J., Cruz-Rizzolo, R. J., & Reinoso-Suarez, F. (2000). The anatomical connections of the macaque monkey orbitofrontal cortex. A review. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 220-242.
8Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., & Larson, C. L. (2000). Dysfunction in the Neural Circuitry of Emotion Regulation-A Possible Prelude to Violence. Science, 289, 591-594.
9de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806.
10Drabant, E. M., McRae, K., Manuck, S. B., Hariri, A. R., & Gross, J. J. (2009). Individual Differences in Typical Reappraisal Use Predict Amygdala and Prefrontal Responses. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 367-373.