期刊文献+

竹山县1965-2012年麻风病发现方式及费用分析

Analysis of the Ways and Cost to Find Leprosy in Zhushan County in 1965-2012
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析麻风病发现方式及费用,探讨基本消灭麻风病后的监测方法。方法收集1965-2012年竹山县发现的麻风病人的资料,采用描述流行病学方法对发现方式与病期、畸残及费用进行分析。结果 1965-2012年,竹山县共发现麻风病人123例,普查、线索调查、疫源地接触者检查、皮肤科就诊和报病奖励发现病人数分别占发现总数的42.28%、20.33%、19.51%、13.82%、4.07%;以疫源地接触者检查早期发现病人的比例最高,且畸残率和费用最低。结论疫源地接触者检查和线索调查仍是发现麻风病人的主动方式。应对病人家属及邻居接触者监测一个最长潜伏期(10年),并适时开展线索调查。 Objective To analyze the ways and cost to find leprosy patients and explore the monitoring methods after ba- sic elimination of leprosy. Methods The data about leprosy patients in Zhushan County from 1965 to 2012 were collected. The discovery method and cost, the disease stage and the incidence of deformities were analyzed by descriptive epidemiology. Results Totally, 123 leprosy patients were discovered in Zhushan County during the period of 1965 - 2012. The cases discov- ered by ways of mass screening, clue survey, epidemic focus contact check, dermatology clinic visiting and reported disease re- ward accounted for 42.28%, 20.33%, 19.51%, 13.82% and 4.07%, respectively. Epidemic focus contact check was the most effective way in the early detection of leprosy patients, with the lowest deformity rate and the lowest cost. Conclusions Epidemic focus contact check and clue survey are still the active ways to find leprosy patients. The family members and neighbors contacting with the leprosy patients should be monitored for a maximum incubation period of 10 years; moreover, timely clue sur- vey should be carried out.
出处 《实用预防医学》 CAS 2013年第10期1192-1194,共3页 Practical Preventive Medicine
基金 中央财政转移支付2012年疾病预防控制项目-麻风病防治项目(鄂财社发[2012]69号) 湖北省财政转移支付疾病预防控制及爱国卫生项目-麻风病项目(鄂卫通[2012]405号) 竹山县2012年科学技术研究与开发项目(竹科发[2012]27号 社发03号)
关键词 麻风病 发现 方法 费用分析 Leprosy Discovery Method Cost analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1林雁嘉,蔡林河,夏枫茂,林斌,姚少莲,黄通良.广东省揭阳市区1956-2000年麻风病流行病学分析[J].中国预防医学杂志,2007,8(1):50-52. 被引量:3
  • 2Global leprosy situation, 2007. Wkly Epidemiol Rec, 2007, 82: 225-232.
  • 3Boldsen JL,Mollemp L, Outside ST, et al. Leprosy in the medieval Danish, City of Odennse. Am J Phys Authropo, 2006,130 : 344-351.
  • 4Boldsen IL. Leprosy and mortality in the Medieval Danish village of Tirup. Am J Phys Anthropol,2005,126(2) :159-168.
  • 5Worth RM. Leprosy in Hawaii ; the end of an epidemic. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis, 1996,64 (4) :441-447.
  • 6Meima A,Ingrens LM, van Oorlmarssen GJ, et al. Disappearance of leprosy from Norway: an exploration of critical factors using an epidemiological modding approach. Int J Epideol, 2002,31 : 991 - 1000.
  • 7Mastro TD, Redd SC, Breiman RF. Imported leprosy in the United States, 1978 through 1988:an epidemic without secondary transmission. Am J Public Health, 1992,82(8) : 1127-1130.
  • 8Taylor JP, Vitek I, Enriquez V, et al. A continuing focus of Hansen's disease in Texas. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 1999,60 : 449-452.
  • 9Enna CD, Jackson RR, Trautman JR, et al. Leprosy in the United states, 1967 - 1976. Public Health Rep, 1978,93 :468-473.
  • 10Gill AL, Bell DR, Gill GV, et al. Leprosy in Britain: 50 years' experience on Liverpool. OJM, 2005,98 : 505-511.

共引文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部