期刊文献+

批判现代主义——本雅明·布赫洛新前卫理论的建构基础 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 本雅明·布赫洛以自己的价值判断建立了一条从现代到新前卫的艺术史发展线索,这条线索成为他判断新前卫的逻辑基础。他通过由杜尚引发的认识论转型,高扬了作为反美学的达达和苏联前卫,批评了徘徊不前的现代主义大师;高扬了反思艺术和社会体制的新前卫,批评了顾恋于同义反复和自我指涉的抽象表现主义、极少主义和部分观念艺术。在布赫洛爱憎分明的当代艺术史和批评的写作中,实际暗藏了一个潜在的判断标准,即艺术对商品社会的不妥协态度,这一标准代替了比格尔对历史前卫的本质主义依赖。
作者 王志亮
出处 《南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计)》 北大核心 2013年第5期63-70,共8页 Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute:Fine Arts & Design
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Alexander Rodchenko, "Against the Synthe%ic Portrait for the Snapshot", Photography in the Modern Era, New York : Metropolit an Museum of Art : Aperture, c1989.PP258-42.
  • 2Benjamin H.D. Buchloh, "Since Realism there was . (On t he Current Conditions of Factographic Art)", Art & Ideology, New York, N.Y. : New Museum of Contemporary Art, c1984.
  • 3Benjamin Buchloh, "From Faktura to Factography," October, Vol. 50 ,Autumn, 1984.
  • 4Bruce Barber, "Introduction to 2004 Edition", Modernism and Modernity: The Vancouver Conference Papers, edited by Benjamin H. D.Buchloh, Serge Guilbaut, and David Solkin,Canada:The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, 2004 Edition.
  • 5"Figures of Authority, Ciphers of Regression," October, Vol. 16, Art World Follies (Spring, 1981), P. 42.
  • 6Joseph Kosuth and Seth Siegelaub,Joseph Kosuth and Seth Siegelaub Reply to Benjamin guchloh on Conceptual Art, October,Vol.57 (Summer, 1991), MIT press, p. 152.
  • 7Benjamin Buchloh, "Benjamin Buchioh Replies to Joseph Kosuth and Seth Siegei&ub," October, Vol.57 (Summer, 1991), MIT press. p.160.
  • 8Boug Brown, "Institutionalism, Critical Theory, and the Admini stration Society", Journal of Economic Issue, Vol. 19, No.2 (Jun., ]985), p.560.
  • 9Benjamin Buchloh,"Conceptual Art 1962-1969:From the Aesthetic of Administration to the Critique of Institutions," October, Vol. 55 (Winter, 1990).
  • 10Pepe Karmel, "The October Century," Art in America, Novem bet 2005, pp. 61-67.

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部