期刊文献+

Mobi-C颈椎人工间盘置换治疗单节段颈椎间盘突出症的效果 被引量:2

Effect of Mobi-C cervical artificial disc replacement in the treatment of single proplase of cervical intervertebral disc
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨Mobi-C颈椎人工间盘置换治疗单节段颈椎间盘突出症的近期效果。方法:对应用Mobi-C颈椎人工间盘置换治疗的12例单节段颈椎间盘突出症患者于术前、术后(1~2 d )及末次随访时进行全面的影像学和临床评价,并进行问卷调查。结果:本组病例随访6~24月,平均13个月。 Odom临床疗效评价优10例,良2例。患者的颈部及上肢疼痛明显缓解,VAS评分术后下降了5.8分(P<0.05),末次随访时下降了5.5分(P<0.05)。颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)和SF-36生活质量量表评分明显改善,患者的生活质量明显提高。除3例患者发生异位骨化外,未发现相邻节段退变加速。结论:保留颈椎活动度的Mobi-C颈椎人工间盘置换对颈椎间盘突出症的患者近期疗效确切,可明显提高患者的生活质量。 Objective:To research the short-term effect of Mobi-C cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) therapy in patients with single proplase of cervical intervertebral disc .Methods:Mobi-C artificial cervical disc was applied to treat 12 cases of single proplase of cervical intervertebral disc .The data about clinical observation , imaging evaluation and questionnaire were collected at preoperative , postoperative ( 1-2 days ) and the end follow-up.Results:The patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months,average 13 months.All the patients were satisfactory to the outcome , excellent in 10 cases and good in 2 cases according to Odom criterion .The pain in upper limb and neck were significantly relieved, the VAS score immediately decreased 5.8 points after operation(P〈0.05), and 5.5 points at the last follow-up(P〈0.05).NDI and SF-36 improved obviously,which meant the patient′s quality of life improved obviously .Degeneration at the adjacent segments was not found in addition to 3 patient with heterotopic ossification .Conclusions:Mobi-C CADR therapy reserving mobility of cervical spine has a good effect in the early stage , and can improve the quality of life of the patients .
出处 《东南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2013年第5期554-559,共6页 Journal of Southeast University(Medical Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30901524)
关键词 颈椎人工间盘置换 颈椎间盘突出症 疗效 生活质量 cervical artificial disc replacement proplase of cervical intervertebral disc curative effect quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1BOSE B. Anterior cervical fusion using Caspar plating: analy- sis of results and review of the literature [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 1998,49( 1 ) :25-31.
  • 2YUE W M, BRODNER W, HIGHLAND T R. Long-term results after anterior cervical diseeetomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11- year radiologie and clinical follow-up study [J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) ,2005,30(19) :2138-2144.
  • 3MATSUMOTO M, OKADA E, ICHIHARA D, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent seg- ment degeneration:comparison with asymptomatie volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) ,2010,35 ( 1 ) :36-43.
  • 4ELSAWAF A, MASTRONARDI L, ROPERTO R, et al. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages [ J ]. Neurosurg Rev,2009, 32(2) :215-224.
  • 5FEKETE T F, PORCHET F. Overview of disc arthroplasty- past,present and future [ J ]. Acta Neurochir ( Wien), 2010, 152 ( 3 ) : 393-404.
  • 6HELLER J G, SASSO R C, PAPADOPOULOS S M, et al. Com- parison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cer- vical decompression and fusion:clinical and radiographic re- sults of a randomized,controlled,clinical trial [J]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976) ,2009,34(2) :101-107.
  • 7WARE J E Jr, SHERBOURNE C D. The MOS 36-item short- form health survey(SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection [J]. Med Care, 1992,30(6) :473-483.
  • 8GOFFIN J, CASEY A, KEHR P, et al. Preliminary clinical ex- perience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis [J].Neuro- surgery,2002,51 (3) :840-845.
  • 9GOFFIN J, Van LOON J,Van CALENBERGH F, et al. A clini- cal analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Pros- thesis [ J ]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2010,12 ( 3 ) : 261- 269.
  • 10孙宇,赵衍斌,周非非,张凤山,潘胜发,刘忠军.Bryan颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后5年随访结果[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(1):1-7. 被引量:21

二级参考文献22

  • 1孙宇,潘胜发,张凤山,张立.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾患的早期临床观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(2):85-89. 被引量:44
  • 2Goffin J. Casey A, Kehr P, et aLPreliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis [J].Neurosurg, 2002,51 (3): 840-847.
  • 3Goffin J , Johan VL, Frank VC. Cervical arthroplasty with the Bryan Disc:4-year results[J].Spine J ,2006,6(Suppl 5) :62-63.
  • 4Goffin J,Johan VL,Frank VC. A clinical analysis of 4- and 6 +year follow -up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis[J].J N eurosurg Spine ,2010,12(3) : 261-269.
  • 5White AA, Panjabi MM. The basic kinematics of the human spine: a review of past and current knowledge[J].Spine, 1978,3 (1): 12-20.
  • 6McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2003,16(4):384-389.
  • 7Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Y oon SH, et al.Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration [J].J Spinal Disord Tech ,2008 ,21 (4) :288-292.
  • 8Bose B. Anterior cervical fusion using Caspar plating-analysis of results and review of the literature[J].Surg Neurol, 1998,49 (1) :25-31.
  • 9Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plating: a 5 to 11 -year radiologic and clinical follow -up study [J]. Spine ,2005 ,30(19) :2138-2144.
  • 10Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine[J].J Spinal Disord Tech ,2004, 17(2): 79-85.

共引文献20

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部