期刊文献+

直肠癌Dixon手术后吻合口瘘相关因素的Logistic分析289例 被引量:4

Risk factors for anastomotic fistula after Dixon operation for rectal cancer:Analysis of 289 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究直肠癌患者行Dixon手术后发生吻合口瘘的相关因素.方法:回顾性分析2009-04/2013-04我院收治的289例行Dixon手术直肠癌患者的性别、年龄、伴有糖尿病、TNM分期、营养指标和吻合口距肛缘距离的情况,统计吻合口瘘的发生情况,并进行Logistic回归分析.结果:直肠癌Dixon手术后吻合口瘘的相关因素中,相对危险度最大的是TNM分期(OR=2.165),相对危险度最小的是吻合口距肛缘距离(OR=0.194).结论:直肠癌Dixon手术后吻合口瘘的相关因素中TNM分期是最大的危险因素,吻合口距肛缘距离是最大的保护因素. AIM: To analyze the risk factors for anastomotic fistula after Dixon operation in patients with rec- tal cancer. METHODS: Clinical data for 289 patients who underwent Dixon operation for rectal cancer from April 2009 to April 2013 at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Factors including gender, age, diabetes, TNM stage, nutritional in- dices and the distance between the anastomosis site and anal edge were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Among the factors possibly affect- ing the development of anastomotic fistula after Dixon operation for rectal cancer, the relative risk of TNM stage was biggest (OR = 2. 165), and that of the distance between the anastomosis site and anal edge was smallest (OR = 0. 194).CONCLUSION: Among the factors possibly af- fecting the development of anastomotic fistula after Dixon operation for rectal cancer, TNM stage is the biggest risk factor, and the distance between the anastomosis site and anal edge is the biggest protective factor.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第27期2881-2885,共5页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
关键词 直肠癌 DIXON手术 吻合口瘘 LOGISTIC分析 Rectal cancer Dixon operation Anas-tomotic fistula Logistic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献88

共引文献180

同被引文献42

  • 1Freek Daams,Misha Luyer,Johan F Lange.Colorectal anastomotic leakage: Aspects of prevention, detection and treatment[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(15):2293-2297. 被引量:12
  • 2崔伟,陈纲,于波.选择性预防性末端回肠造瘘在低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用[J].临床军医杂志,2010,38(5):702-704. 被引量:23
  • 3王锡山.直肠癌保肛系列问题探讨[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2006,20(6):480-483. 被引量:21
  • 4A Doeksen,PJ Tanis,BC Vrouenraets,JJB Lanschot van,WF Tets van.Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2007,13(27):3721-3725. 被引量:18
  • 5李凌江,杨德森.生活质量综合评定问卷(成人用)心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.88-100
  • 6Booth RA. Mminimally invasive biomarkers for detection and stag- ing of colorectal cancer[J]. Cancer Lerrers, 2007,249( 1 ) :87- 96.
  • 7Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grad- ing of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rec- tum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer[ J]. Surgery, 2010,147 (3) :339-351.
  • 8Liang X, Hou S, Liu H, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Laparo- scopic ResectionVersus Open Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cane- er: A Randomized, Controlled Trial fmmChina[ J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 2011,21 (5) :381-385.
  • 9Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancerafter neoadjuvant chemoradio- therapy ( COREAN trial ) : short-term outcomes of an open-label randomized controlled trlal[ J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11 (7) :637 - 645.
  • 10Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparo- scopic surgery versus open surgery for colon caneer: long-term out- come of a randomized clinical trial [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2009,10 ( 1 ) :44-52.

引证文献4

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部